BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

National land-reclamation program

Expert replies
by durgesh79 » Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:27 pm
The report released by the interior ministry states that within the past 5 years the national land-reclamation program has created a 19 percent increase in arable land within the country. If these figures are accurate, the program has been a huge success. Senator Cox, a distinguished mathematician and a woman of brilliance, maintains, however, that the reclamation program could not possibly have been successful. Clearly, therefore, the figures cited in the report cannot be accurate. The argument above exhibits an erroneous pattern of reasoning most similar to that exhibited by which one of the following?

A) Albert's father claims that Albert does not know where the spare car keys are hidden. Yesterday however, Albert reported that he had discovered the spare car keys in the garage toolbox, so his father's claim cannot be true.

B) Gloria's drama teacher claims that her policy is to give each student the opportunity to act in at least one play during the year but, since Gloria, who attended every class, reports that she was not given such an opportunity the teacher's claim cannot be true.

C) Amos claims that he can hold his breath under water for a full hour. Dr. Treviso, a cardiopulmonary specialist, has stated that humans are physiologically incapable of holding their breath for even half that long; so Amos' claim cannot be true.

D) Evelyn reports that she got home before midnight. Robert, who always knows the time, insists that she did not. If Robert is right, Evelyn could not possibly have listened to the late news; since she admits not having listened to the late news, her report cannot be true.

E) Moira, after observing the finish of the 60-kilometer bicycle race, reports that Lee won with Adams a distant third. Lomas, a bicycle engineering expert, insists, however, that Lee could not have won a race in which Adams competed; so Moira's report cannot be true.
Last edited by durgesh79 on Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by agent47 » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:22 pm
E is the best answer...
Join the discussion

by senthil » Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:51 pm
i too feel its E
Join the discussion

by reachac » Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:19 pm
IMO E
Join the discussion

by atlantic » Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:00 am
E for me also.

Pls do not forget to post OA
Join the discussion

by durgesh79 » Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:49 pm
OA is E, but i feel C is also close

appriciate if someone can compare C and E and why E is better.
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:12 pm
To me C is a claim (its just a claim, we don't know whether he ever did or not) and its disputed by a research scientist

E is a report of an action similar to the original argument. So some thing happened and she reported it. There is a proof that it happened and Moira watched it. The expert is saying that it is wrong and cannot happen. Probably Moira screwed up just like the people in original report might have

On a side note. Its my understanding that erroneous pattern of reasoning is not a GMAT Q but LSAT Q. Can you please confirm? If you are trying to sharpen the brains its good.
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Join the discussion

by durgesh79 » Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:25 pm
chidcguy wrote:On a side note. Its my understanding that erroneous pattern of reasoning is not a GMAT Q but LSAT Q. Can you please confirm? If you are trying to sharpen the brains its good.
Thanks. The problem is from 800score.com test. i got it wrong and wasnt satisfied with the OE (below)

(E) This argument uses the 'appeal to authority' fallacy. This is when someone's credentials automatically establish something as fact and negate any opposing arguments. A, B and D do not use appeals to authority. The two choices that improperly use an appeal are (C) and (E). (E) is better because it more closely resembles the passage because it attempts to use the information to negate an argument already made.
Join the discussion

by gauravgundal » Sat May 21, 2011 10:24 am
I am at times confused with such type of question. Experts can you please show me how to deduce correct information from such type of argument,in which we have to find the analogy between the argument and the answer choice.

One of the reason for me to reach the correct answer choice E is that the argument has two conclusions /viewpoints each refuting other from two persons and one of the person is an expert in his field.

So the finally I penned down to answer choice E.

Please let me know whether my process of answer selection is right.
Guide me with some useful techniques to solve such interesting problems.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sat May 21, 2011 2:07 pm
gauravgundal wrote:I am at times confused with such type of question. Experts can you please show me how to deduce correct information from such type of argument,in which we have to find the analogy between the argument and the answer choice.
before you spend too much time on the following advice, be advised that your chance of actually seeing this question type on the GMAT is close to zero.
in fact, i don't think i've ever seen a "mimic the argument" question on official materials, other than in the RC section (see e.g. #16 on p.365 of OG12).
so don't be too worried.

--

in general, the best way to attack these problems is to write an abstract "formula" in which the statements are represented by variables. (the crowd at this site -- which seems to be inclined toward that kind of thinking in general -- should be good at this.) then just see which answer choice conforms to the same "formula".

in this problem, the "formula" is
Informed observer said: X; therefore, Y.
Expert on related topic says: Not Y; therefore, not X.

the only choice that has this form is (e).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion