Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Nash and Tucker

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:33 am
Two automobile manufacturers, Nash and Tucker, declared profits on the sales of their cars for the year 1998. Which manufacturer posted the greatest profit?

1. Nash's total cost per automobile is 78% of the sales price, and in 1998, it sold 250,000 automobiles.

2. Tucker's total cost per automobile is 85% of the sales price, and in 1998, it sold 200,000 automobiles.

Prove your point. OA in the next post.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. –Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mals24 » Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:45 am
Ill go with E

A/B/D are out since St 1 gives no information about Tucker and St 2 gives no information about Nash

C is also out since we either need to have actual numbers for the cost and sale price of each company or some relationship between the cost and sale price of the two companies. Since we have neither information C is also out.

So E.
Join the discussion

by mrsmarthi » Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:41 pm
We need to know atleast the total Selling price of both N and T or the SP price of each automobile inadditionl to the information provided in Stmt 1 and stmt 2.

Hence E.
Join the discussion