BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Napoleon’s army

Expert replies
by rohit9359 » Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:34 am
Q. Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
(A) they had in their previous campaigns
(B) their previous campaigns had had
(C) they had for any previous campaign
(D) in their previous campaigns
(E) for any previous campaign

OA is [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]. Why not [spoiler](C)[/spoiler]?

Thanks,
Rohit.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by karmayogi » Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:22 am
Rule:
1. Read non-underlined part (NUP) of the sentence very carefully because your underlined part (UP) can change but NUP can’t.
2. Correctness of UP depends on NUP.

There might be some confusion whether "Napoleon’s army" is singular or plural. Check the NUP: "Napoleon’s army." Clearly, "army" is singular. Except E, all other options have pronoun problem.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:39 am
karmyogi, i have a ques for u..
if in the statement below, i replace 'they' by 'it', then will the statement be correct or there would be a problem that 'it' represents which of these? army or Russia. please reply.

Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:04 am
ketkoag wrote:karmyogi, i have a ques for u..
if in the statement below, i replace 'they' by 'it', then will the statement be correct or there would be a problem that 'it' represents which of these? army or Russia. please reply.

Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
Army is a collective noun, and is always singular. The plural form of army is armies. Hence, we can't use "they" for Nepolean's army. I agree with you that there is some ambiguity in the use of 'it', but 'it' is part of NUP (non underlined portion), which you can't change. Also, 'it' is logically referring to the army.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by walker » Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:15 am
ketkoag wrote:karmyogi, i have a ques for u..
if in the statement below, i replace 'they' by 'it', then will the statement be correct or there would be a problem that 'it' represents which of these? army or Russia. please reply.

Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
No! ketkoag

even if u have the sentence replace 'they' by 'it', the sentence will still bcome wordy. why we need unnecessary pronoun to refer back army.

Also u will break parellism for more x than y idiom by introducing an pronoun there.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1