BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

My way of memorizing SC 'topics'

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
Expert replies
by piyushdabomb » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:14 pm
Hi,

Don't have a question but a memory statement regarding Sentence Correction type questions. After going through the MGMAT SC book, I've noticed that 'majority' of the Sentences Fall into the topics rightly provided by the MGMAT book.

Because I'm a very QUANT type person and SC seems to be the only section I can treat like a math problem, I memorize the SC topics using the following phrase:

CPIMPS(TM). If you can remember the letter C, PIMPS and TM (for TradeMark), what you can do is use the term for majority of your sentence corrections.

C = Concision
P = Pronoun
I = Idioms
M = Modifiers
P = Parallelism
S = S-V Agreement
T = Tense
M = Meaning

What I do is that when I see an SC question, first write CPIMPS(TM) on my sheet and for each topic going backwards, I look for possible errors in the original sentence. If I find them, I scan the answer choices and start eliminating!

For me this works because I'm a very structured person. I NEED to have a start and end point. CPIMPS(TM) keeps me from forgetting what to look for.

The order doesn't matter as much as knowing what to look for. I've noticed that if I'm stuck because I can't find any possible issues, by using these topics in a structured fashion, I can crack the case.
-------------------
Sincerely,

Piyush A.
Join the discussion
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |

by komal » Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:37 am
This is a simple yet very effective strategy, thx a million for sharing it
Join the discussion

by sars72 » Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:53 am
Interesting. This will definitely be helpful for those who are in the initial phases of their GMAT prep. However, in my case atleast, I followed the split strategy specified in the MGMAT book and found it quite effective. First check for an error in the given statement(s). If you find an error, then scan the answer choices and check if the mistake is repeated. Eliminate those. Check the similarities between the remaining answer choices and group them into sets e.g. 2 choices will use "had" and the other 2 will use "have" instead. Eliminiate accordinly until you arrive at the BEST answer.
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:36 pm
piyushdabomb wrote:Hi,

Don't have a question but a memory statement regarding Sentence Correction type questions. After going through the MGMAT SC book, I've noticed that 'majority' of the Sentences Fall into the topics rightly provided by the MGMAT book.

Because I'm a very QUANT type person and SC seems to be the only section I can treat like a math problem, I memorize the SC topics using the following phrase:

CPIMPS(TM). If you can remember the letter C, PIMPS and TM (for TradeMark), what you can do is use the term for majority of your sentence corrections.

C = Concision
P = Pronoun
I = Idioms
M = Modifiers
P = Parallelism
S = S-V Agreement
T = Tense
M = Meaning

What I do is that when I see an SC question, first write CPIMPS(TM) on my sheet and for each topic going backwards, I look for possible errors in the original sentence. If I find them, I scan the answer choices and start eliminating!

For me this works because I'm a very structured person. I NEED to have a start and end point. CPIMPS(TM) keeps me from forgetting what to look for.

The order doesn't matter as much as knowing what to look for. I've noticed that if I'm stuck because I can't find any possible issues, by using these topics in a structured fashion, I can crack the case.
hey piyush grt technique.....
i was wondering if u cud post one or two s/c question demonstrating your approach ....
thanks
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:07 pm
thanks for posting this... worst case scenario... someone writes it down on the top of their notepad... if it helps 1 person get 1 question correct then that's great... i think i've gotten to a place where im usually aware of what to look for... but hey you never know right?
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:17 am
Piyush Bhai,

awesome!!! Plz do post some examples showcasing the tip CPIMPS(TM)
Join the discussion

by piyushdabomb » Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:47 am
I'm really sorry I just got to this.

I'll show you how this works in a couple days! Its worked VERY well for me so far. Although I'm not getting them 'all' right, at least, I'm close using CPIMPS.
-------------------
Sincerely,

Piyush A.
Join the discussion

by piyushdabomb » Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:57 am
money9111 wrote:thanks for posting this... worst case scenario... someone writes it down on the top of their notepad... if it helps 1 person get 1 question correct then that's great... i think i've gotten to a place where im usually aware of what to look for... but hey you never know right?
I can imagine that after 5 time pressured sections on the GMAT exam, it must be difficult to remember everything, unless you have spent a significant amount of time on SC alone to know it all (or are an english major). With these guidelines, it helps to just have your head wrapped around the major concepts.
-------------------
Sincerely,

Piyush A.
Join the discussion

by piyushdabomb » Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:58 am
sars72 wrote:Interesting. This will definitely be helpful for those who are in the initial phases of their GMAT prep. However, in my case atleast, I followed the split strategy specified in the MGMAT book and found it quite effective. First check for an error in the given statement(s). If you find an error, then scan the answer choices and check if the mistake is repeated. Eliminate those. Check the similarities between the remaining answer choices and group them into sets e.g. 2 choices will use "had" and the other 2 will use "have" instead. Eliminiate accordinly until you arrive at the BEST answer.
Sars - Thanks. I agree with using the SPLIT method, but what are you going to split if you don't know what to look for?

CPIMPS(TM) seems to help watch out for splits, IMO.
-------------------
Sincerely,

Piyush A.
Join the discussion