BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

My grandfather says that

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 amFollowed by: 80 members
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
GMAT Score:760
by sanju09 » Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:26 pm
My grandfather says that, most of the new clothes that he has purchased have fallen apart in a very short time. He also points out that most of the vintage clothes that he bought are still in excellent condition, even thought they were more than 15 years old when he bought them. So he concludes that clothes made today are inferior in terms of how long they last as compared to vintage clothes.

Which of the following is a major weakness in his conclusion?

(A) It does not take into account the fact that raw materials available then were of much better quality
(B) It does not take into account the fact that, if prices are adjusted for inflation, the vintage clothes would turn out to be much more expensive than today's clothes
(C) It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the ratio of items that are useless today
(D) It does not take into account the stitching pattern
(E) It fails to take into account clothes made over 15 years ago that are no longer fit for sale


[spoiler]Source: freegmattest.net[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 22 times
GMAT Score:680

by beatthegmatinsept » Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:57 pm
sanju09 wrote:My grandfather says that, most of the new clothes that he has purchased have fallen apart in a very short time. He also points out that most of the vintage clothes that he bought are still in excellent condition, even thought they were more than 15 years old when he bought them. So he concludes that clothes made today are inferior in terms of how long they last as compared to vintage clothes.

Which of the following is a major weakness in his conclusion?

(A) It does not take into account the fact that raw materials available then were of much better quality
(B) It does not take into account the fact that, if prices are adjusted for inflation, the vintage clothes would turn out to be much more expensive than today's clothes
(C) It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the ratio of items that are useless today
(D) It does not take into account the stitching pattern
(E) It fails to take into account clothes made over 15 years ago that are no longer fit for sale


[spoiler]Source: freegmattest.net[/spoiler]
Confused.. I was able to eliminate A, D and E. Between C and E, I'd go for E. But I am really not sure.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Fri Aug 13, 2010 4:18 am
IMO e
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:27 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 6 times

by ashish2104 » Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:00 am
IMO C.

C mentions ratio of n(clothes sold)/ n(items useless today). As per the argument structure any choice that links old and new clothes is the basis of the conclusion. This choice exploits the confusion made in linking old and new clothes.

For E,I dont understand how it will weaken the argument. Even if old clothes are no longer fit for sale, the conculsion that today's clothes are inferior in comparioson to old clothes is not weakened.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:56 am
Thanked: 4 times

by abhigang » Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:04 am
IMO E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 74 times

by uwhusky » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:35 am
IMO it's A.

Premise:
Most of the new clothes that Grandpa has purchased have fallen apart in a very short time; most of the vintage clothes that he bought are still in excellent condition, even thought they were more than 15 years old
Conclusion:
that clothes made today are inferior in terms of how long they last as compared to vintage clothes.
A weakening CR question like this one, one should look for alternative explanations, issues with statistic, reverse answer, and any attempt to create disconnect between premise and conclusion.

A is the only one of 5 that actually addresses the argument.

B is referring to cost - out of scope.
C is attacking the ratio - possible contender with statistic.
D is also out of scope.
E is referring to vintage clothes and whether or not they are fit for sale - out of scope.

C might have worked with better verbiage, but I doubt a correct answer on GMAT would describe issues within stat and call it useless.

So again, my answer is A - it also passes the assumption negate technique.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:21 am
beatthegmatinsept wrote:
sanju09 wrote:My grandfather says that, most of the new clothes that he has purchased have fallen apart in a very short time. He also points out that most of the vintage clothes that he bought are still in excellent condition, even thought they were more than 15 years old when he bought them. So he concludes that clothes made today are inferior in terms of how long they last as compared to vintage clothes.

Which of the following is a major weakness in his conclusion?

(A) It does not take into account the fact that raw materials available then were of much better quality
(B) It does not take into account the fact that, if prices are adjusted for inflation, the vintage clothes would turn out to be much more expensive than today's clothes
(C) It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the ratio of items that are useless today
(D) It does not take into account the stitching pattern
(E) It fails to take into account clothes made over 15 years ago that are no longer fit for sale


[spoiler]Source: freegmattest.net[/spoiler]

Confused.. I was able to eliminate A, D and E. Between C and E, I'd go for E. But I am really not sure.
A is out of scope. it doesnt mention if today clothes and vintage are made from raw material
E is too weak to weakend the conclusion. i think even if vintage clothes are no longer fit for sale, it cant explain or copnclude that its quality is better or worse. its not sold now just because its not model for today. it cant explainf or anything
B. price in B is out of scope. who care of the price?
D. who care of how they sewed it and how the stitching is!
thus my answer is C
what is the OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 4:55 pm

by [email protected] » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:08 am
IMO-E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Sat Aug 14, 2010 4:14 am
IMO C
--------
Ankur mittal
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:28 am
no choice is looking convincing.

Only expert can help.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:54 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by DarkKnight » Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:00 pm
I will go with A as well.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:10 pm
sanju09 wrote:My grandfather says that, most of the new clothes that he has purchased have fallen apart in a very short time. He also points out that most of the vintage clothes that he bought are still in excellent condition, even thought they were more than 15 years old when he bought them. So he concludes that clothes made today are inferior in terms of how long they last as compared to vintage clothes.

Which of the following is a major weakness in his conclusion?

(A) It does not take into account the fact that raw materials available then were of much better quality
Strengthens
(B) It does not take into account the fact that, if prices are adjusted for inflation, the vintage clothes would turn out to be much more expensive than today's clothes
Out of Scope
(C) It confuses the number of clothing items sold with the ratio of items that are useless today
Out of Scope
(D) It does not take into account the stitching pattern
Out of Scope
(E) It fails to take into account clothes made over 15 years ago that are no longer fit for sale
Weakens. Will go with 'E'.


[spoiler]Source: freegmattest.net[/spoiler]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pmFollowed by: 694 members
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:45 am
Received a PM asking me to respond. Not a fan of this one. It's written in non-standard format pretty much throughout, which makes me question the value of this one as a GMAT question.

Also, there's a comma in the first sentence that should not be there. Perhaps that's just a typo made by whoever typed it in... but if that comma is really in the original sentence, then run away from this question and this source. :)

The question itself is non-standard. On official questions, we're asked to weaken the conclusion, which is a different question than being asked what a major weakness is. The question is more like an LSAT flaw question (though, even then, the wording is non-standard).

The answer choices read like LSAT answer choices, not GMAT answer choices. On the GMAT, weaken choices are presented as new pieces of information that potentially add to the argument in some way. The correct answer adds a new piece of information that serves to make it somewhat less likely that the conclusion is valid.

So... if you're studying for the GMAT, this is really not the kind of question you want to study.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1