BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

My answer is different from the correct answer - Please help

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:30 am
Thanked: 1 times
by ggmat007 » Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:07 pm
Is 1 / (a-b) < (b-a)? (1) a < b (2) 1 < |a-b|

Answer: A

Approach:

Rephrase: Is 1<(a-b)(b-a)?

1) a < b
If a, b are both +ve, Both -ve, or -ve & +ve
1 > (a-b) (b-a)
Statement (1) is sufficient.

2) 1 < |a-b|

case 1: a-b>1 if a-b>0 or a>b
case 2: b-a>1 if a-b<0 or a<b

For case 2 we know that the statement 1 > (a-b) (b-a) is always true

Even for case 1: a>b, (a,b) = (9,7) or (-7,-10) or (7,-2) we get: 1 > (a-b) (b-a) is always true

and therefore statement 2 is also sufficient.

My answer is D but the correct answer is A. Can anyone please help me understand why statement 2 is not sufficient and where is the problem with my approach.

Thanks in advance :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:58 pm
ggmat007 wrote:Is 1 / (a-b) < (b-a)?

(1) a < b
(2) 1 < |a-b|

Rephrase: Is 1<(a-b)(b-a)?
When you multiplied each side of the inequality in the question stem by a-b, you presumed that a-b>0.
If a-b<0, then the direction of the inequality symbol in your rephrase must FLIP from < to >.
Since the sign of a-b is unknown, it's safer not to rephrase the question stem.

Statement 1: a < b
Thus:
a-b < 0.
b-a > 0.
Here, we can rephrase 1/(a-b) < b-a as follows:
1/(negative) < positive.
negative < positive.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: 1 < |a-b|
Case 1: a-b = 2, implying that b-a = -2.
If we plug a-b = 2 and b-a = -2 into 1/(a-b) < b-a, we get:
1/2 < -2
NO.

Case 2: a-b = -2, implying that b-a = 2.
If we plug a-b = -2 and b-a = 2 into 1/(a-b) < b-a, we get:
1/(-2) < 2
-1/2 < 2.
YES.

Since in the first case the answer is NO, but in the second case the answer is YES, INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 amFollowed by: 12 members
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:27 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: Statement 2: |a-b| < 1.
I think this should be reverse?
Regards,

Pranay
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:34 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote: Statement 2: |a-b| < 1.

I think this should be reverse?
Yes -- edited my reply above.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1