BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Museums that house Renaissance

Expert replies
by akhpad » Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:35 am
Source: OG 12 Ed

Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in environments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration. Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well. If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is an objection that has been raised against the position taken by the argument; the second is the position taken by the argument.
(B) The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is the position that the argument calls into question.
(C) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is, in part, based.
(D) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is that position.
(E) The first is a claim that the argument calls into question; the second is the position taken by the argument.

OA: D
Last edited by akhpad on Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by akhpad » Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:40 am
Can someone explain above CR based on both flow diagram method (premise-assumption-conclusion) and backup method?
Last edited by akhpad on Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by vivek1110 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:50 am
I think it's D, what's the OA?
Is caught between a rock and a hard place!
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:38 am
akhp77 wrote:Can someone explain above CR based on both method flow chart and back run?
I don't know what these terms refer to, but let's approach the question as you would any critical reasoning argument:

Look for the author's main point (i.e. conclusion) : Museums would be rash to relax those standards

Note that this conclusion is reached even though the author concedes that museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings, if it is assumed that paint is the most sensitive substance in these works.

The author presents evidence casting doubt on this assumption (the results of preliminary tests...
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:59 pm
I am unfamiliar with your terms but I can say on this type of argument I would find the conclusion

"Museums would be rash to reduce energy" and the premise "gesso cannot withstand variations"

Then you look to what the bolded phrases are - the second is the opposite of the conclusion and the first is a statement in support of the opposite of the conclusion.
a) the second phrase is NOT the position taken by the argument

b) The first is a reason, not the position
c) The second is not a judgement, it is the opposite of the argument

d) is the correct answer because the second is a position that the argument calls into question and the first is evidence in support of the second.

e) again, the second is not the position taken by the argument.
In this question I found it eaier to focus on the second statement and eliminate answers that don't match, then figure out the first part.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:47 pm
I understood up to some extent.


Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since .... gesso is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

Conclusion:
Museums would be rash to relax those standards.

Premise:
Gesso is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

Premise is against 2nd boldface but Conclusion support 2nd boldface. 1st boldface support to 2nd boldface.. Is it correct?



tpr-becky, Evidence can not be the judgment.
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:49 pm
The judgment of another person is used as evidence to support the conclusion that the argument's conclusion argues against. so in this case the judgment of some experts is evidence.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion