BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Museum - Plz explain.

Expert replies
by Mani_mba » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:33 pm
It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially when a generous patron donates a potential exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require storage space, which is not free, and routine conservation, which is rather expensive. Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum's financial resources.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) To keep patrons well disposed, a museum will find it advisable to put at least some donated
objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage.
(B) The people who are most likely to donate valuable objects to a museum are also the people who are most likely to make cash gifts to it.
(C) A museum cannot save money by resorting to cheap storage under less than adequate conditions, because so doing would drive up the cost of conservation.
(D) Patrons expect a museum to keep donated objects in its possession rather than to raise cash by selling them.
(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:08 pm
IMO B
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:58 am
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:59 am
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:IMO B
Vivek,
People are most likely to make gift
also
the gift will be one time
and maintenance cost is life long....

and the gift amount can be very very less as compared to cost of maintenance....
Join the discussion

by LifetimesofSC » Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:07 am
E because weakening the conclusion, the cost of the object consuming the space should be worth more than the space costs.

Come on E
Final Answer.

Whats OA?
Join the discussion

by Mani_mba » Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:04 am
OA is E.
Join the discussion

by bleacherseat » Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:37 pm
These questions are from a document that is widely available on internet.

Some of the answers are just mind boggling.

I have an accuracy of close to 90% when doing official questions . But with these questions , its all a toss up.

I thinnk B is the answer.



E - doesnt support how is the donation not a financial burden which is what the conclusion is driving.

May be donations are large enough to cover the storage and maintetnce.

Stop@800 . Pls try to explain when you pick an answer. ALL of your picks are right , may be I am missing something . I'd like to know the process that leads you to that answer choice.
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:41 pm
[email protected] we go by E....i think that is strengtning the argument.Reason ....Conclusion says..it excabrates the finanicial load on musuem. but if they have to purchase from outside also..thats gonna add to their pocket. How, this will weaken the conclusion.,,
Sorry for spelling errors..i am really bad in spellings.
Join the discussion

by chase4meg » Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:03 am
My justification for E -

The argument concludes that the gifts do not lighten the museum's financial resources. We have to weaken this conclusion by proving it is actually beneficial.

Choice E is correct because it says that the museum will anyway have to buy these artifacts - So it saves the cost of buying these artifacts if they are obtained as gifts.

Hope this clarifies...
Join the discussion

by mytarget720 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:21 am
Hi , Even my opinion is E. What is the actual answer.
Join the discussion

by mytarget720 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:24 am
Hi , Even my opinion is E. What is the actual answer.
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:40 am
stop@800 wrote:
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:IMO B
Vivek,
People are most likely to make gift
also
the gift will be one time
and maintenance cost is life long....

and the gift amount can be very very less as compared to cost of maintenance....

How can u say that maintenance cost is expensive than cash they donate. In E also it says..they buy the artifacts...so it furthur adds to the finance of the musuem...how its decreasing that load..Pls explain
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:08 pm
Picked E.

Conclusion:Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum's financial resources.

objects donates --> leading to cost increase for the museums.

To weaken it,I was watching out for choices that really help the museum rather ease the financial burden on the museums.

I short listed B,E.

Eliminated B.I believe E is more closely related to the argument than B.
Join the discussion

by bleacherseat » Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:18 pm
AJ,

While you may have thought process that is better than mine since you are right on this one. But I can't understand E as an answer.

One of my observation in critical reasoning is that you have to take into account the premise that leads to conclusion. A conclusion can be strenthened by lot of things when not taken in a context.

In this case , E says , museum would have bought the statute if they were no donated. How is this not a financial burden ?


the structure of the argument is --

artifacts are donated - > cost of storage and upkeep increases.

what weakens it ??

If you look at E , it suggests that finance may not be a problem for museum since it has the resources to buy and pay for the upkeep. But it going off on a tangent.


But B , while not a very strong statement suggests that donations may be an source to pay for the expenses.
Before reading the answer choices I was looking for something close to revenue generation by those artifacts when on display. Since I did not find that one , to me B appeared next best.


Care to explain what process leads you to E ?

B is more relebant to me than E.
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:15 pm
Here goes my reasoning:

museum helped with donations

but actually
donations take space and maintenance

so such gifts are burden

now we need to weaken
that is we need to prove that space and maintenance of donated items is not a burden....


lets see each option one by one


A
some on exhibit
has nothing to do with space and maintenance cost


B
people will make cash gifts

first they are most likely to make
what about those who will not

also
how long will this cash gift help (for maintenance)
1 yr... 2 yr.. 10 years
but wht about afterwards............
[We can keep thsi for time being but it will go off later]


C
it says we can not reduce the storage cost...
so it actually strengthens that it will be a burden


D
they expect to keep objects with museum
and not to sell
again museum will have to bear all those costs


E
it says museum will any way buy these
so after buying also
museum will spend on space and maintenance
so if it's getting the items for free
its a positive
hence this becomes our answer


Hope this helps!!!
Join the discussion