BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Multiples - GMAT Prep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by codesnooker » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:15 am
It is a very simple question.

According to statement (1), n is a multiple of 20.

i.e n = 20x, where x = ....-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3......

So n = .....-60, -40, -20, 0, 20, 40, 60,.....

But still n can be and can not be multiple of 15. Hence, Statement (1) is alone insufficient. Therefore, (A) and (D) are out.

According to statement (2), n+6 is multiple of 3.

i.e. (n+6) = 3x, where x = ....-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3......
So n = .....--3, 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21,..30, 60, 90

But still n can be and can not be multiple of 15. Hence, Statement (2) is alone insufficient. Therefore, (B) is also out

Now lets take both the statements together,

So, -40, -20, 20, 40 etc are out. and only with n = ....-120, -60, 0, 60, 120....

Which is multiple of 15. Hence, both statements together are sufficient.

HTH...
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:09 pm
Can there be any underlying rule that if n is a multiple of 3 (from statement b, we know that n is a multiple of 3) and if n is a multiple of 20, for both statements to be true, n MUST be a multiple of 15? I was just hoping if we can solve this problem with out picking numbers by looking at some underlying rule ? Any suggestions?
Join the discussion

Re: Multiples - GMAT Prep

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:38 pm
rosh26 wrote:Is integer n a multiple of 15?

I n is a multiple of 20

II n+6 is a multiple of 3

Answer is C

Can someone please explain?
Yes, there's no need to pick numbers here. The question asks 'Is n a multiple of 15'. It's a divisibility question, so it will normally be best to think about prime factorizations. We can translate the question:

Is n a multiple of 15 --> Is n a multiple of 3*5 --> Is n a multiple of both 3 and 5?

From 1: n is a multiple of 20 --> n is a multiple of 2^2*5. We don't care about the 2s for this question, but this does tell us that n is a multiple of 5. Not sufficient- we need to know if n is a multiple of 3 as well.

From 2: n+ 6 is a multiple of 3. Notice this just means that n is a multiple of 3 (if you add or subtract 6 from a multiple of 3, you'll get another multiple of 3). Not sufficient- we need to know if n is a multiple of 5.

From 1+2: we know n is a multiple of 3 and 5, which is what we wanted.

As a general note (and as a partial response to ildude's question in another thread, about working on DS questions), it is often very helpful on DS questions to translate the information given into more useful information. DS questions often do not present information in the most intuitive way. Here, for example, we had to translate the information into information about primes. In other questions, you might see equations like |x| = -x. That may look a bit confusing at first glance, but when you notice it just means that x is negative, it's a lot easier to think about.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:00 pm
As always, nice to see your great explanation. Thanks a bunch.
Join the discussion

by getbig » Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:41 am
Many thanks Ian.. your explanation was fantastic.
Join the discussion

by glorydefined » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:57 pm
hi Ian,

that piece of information ( |x|=-x ; is nothing but x is -ve)is awesome....ive been looking for stuff like this, could you please post more such things related to inequalities and modulus equations??? :wink:
Join the discussion

by inmate » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:18 pm
What does it mean when we say multiple of a #?
Join the discussion