maihuna wrote:Ian,
Can you please elaborate further steps on how to pick the magic numbers here in the two steps mentioned by you.
Regards,
maihuna
Well, there's not really any 'magic' involved, because if you do any similar sequence of steps to what I did above, you'll arrive at the answer. Of course, it helps a lot to know the correct answer in advance; picking numbers, as moutar did above, seems the best approach in test conditions.
I only wanted to show *why* the relationship is true, no matter what x and y are. The goal is to rewrite the expression in its simplest form (with the smallest possible numbers). Factoring seems the best way to do that. Looking at 3x + 7y, there is no common factor, but if you add 11x (to get 14x + 7y), or 11y (to get 3x + 18y), for example (there are many other options), you can then factor something out, and get smaller numbers in your expression. So, for example, since 14x + 7y is divisible by 11, and since 14x + 7y = 7(2x + y), then 2x+y must be divisible by 11, since 7 is not. Once you discover that 2x + y must be a multiple of 11, it's easier to build up all of the combinations of x and y that must be divisible by 11. So, for example, you could instead do:
3x + 7y is divisible by 11
14x + 7y is divisible by 11 (add 11x)
2x + y is divisible by 11 (factor out 7)
4x + 2y is divisible by 11 (multiply by 2)
4x - 9y is divisible by 11 (subtract 11y)
In any case, it doesn't seem much like any real GMAT question I've ever seen.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com