Option A: Wrong
Here, the help of an expert is needed for situational analysis to show cause why its's going to be a positive or negative ventures. Allowing the company executive to handle such a visionary projects may be over-whelming ans self serving for them in which case we cant rule out the possibility of massive corruption.

Option B: Wrong
Different strokes for different folks they say. Allowing for better decisions to be made means you have to engage the service of expert consultants to help in that regards. The occupational expertise of company executives may be a bit transcend beyond the four walls of the company. Here, services of Expert consultants are needed.

Option C: Wrong
There is only one way this could have happened, sharp drop in patonage as a result of fading credibility in consulting market. Maybe due to one mistake or the other or one advise went wrong it'd be easy for the contracting company to place the blame on them since the bulk stops on the executives' table.

Option D: Wrong
This is a positive statement and does not in any way inhibit the success of the experts, those he has recorded to put him in a vantage position as against Ms Fring's assertions.

Option E: Right
This is exactly Ms Fring's position that it'd be easy to easily blame the expert consultants whenever things go wrong. A profit barely makes profit on the basis of advises given by an expert would not hesitate to blame him/her immediately.