BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Movie - Critical Reasoning(Explain/Resolve)

Expert replies
by nakulgar » Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:52 pm
Q) In september of last year, the number of people attending movies in theatres dropped precipitously.During the next few weeks after this initial drop the number of filmgoers reamined well below what had been the weekly average for the preceding year .However, the total number of filmgoers for the entire year was not appreciably different from the preceding year's volume.

Which of the following , if true, resolves the apparent contradiction presented in the passage above ?

A) People under the age of 25 usually attend films in groups,rather than singly.
B) The gross income from box office receipts reamined about the same as it had been the preceding year.
C) For some portion of last year , the number of people attending movies in theaters was higher than it had been during the previous year .
D) The number of people attending movies in theaters rises and falls in predictable cycles .
E) The quality of films released in September and October of last year was particularly poor.

Please provide your answers with explanations . I personally choses C .
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ArunangsuSahu » Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:35 pm
(D)
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:39 pm
- In Sept, # of attendees dropped
- In Oct, # of attendees stayed below previous year's weekly avg
- TOTAL number of filmgoers was not different from previous year

Question: How come?

Prediction: The months outside of Sept/Oct made up for the drop & allowed the year to remain consistent

A - irrelevant
B - irrelevant, we're talking filmgoers not $$
C - boom, matches our prediction!
D - potentially, but more vague than C
E - irrelevant, we're talking # of people not quality

Clearly it comes down to C and D. C is my choice since it most closely matches our prediction.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:42 pm
Some portion may be 1 month or 2 mnths...SO not completely OK
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:15 pm
VivianKerr wrote: Prediction: The months outside of Sept/Oct made up for the drop & allowed the year to remain consistent

A - irrelevant
B - irrelevant, we're talking filmgoers not $$
C - boom, matches our prediction!: I do not fully agree until I understand the explanation. Could you please explain about some? It actually is Vague. But at the same time I agree with you that D is also Vague. . Could you explain why did you choose to keep C?
D - potentially, but more vague than C
E - irrelevant, we're talking # of people not quality

Clearly it comes down to C and D. C is my choice since it most closely matches our prediction.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:24 pm
In september of last year, the number of people attending movies in theatres dropped precipitously.During the next few weeks after this initial drop the number of filmgoers reamined well below what had been the weekly average for the preceding year .However, the total number of filmgoers for the entire year was not appreciably different from the preceding year's volume.

Which of the following , if true, resolves the apparent contradiction presented in the passage above ?

A) People under the age of 25 usually attend films in groups,rather than singly.
B) The gross income from box office receipts reamined about the same as it had been the preceding year.
C) For some portion of last year , the number of people attending movies in theaters was higher than it had been during the previous year .
D) The number of people attending movies in theaters rises and falls in predictable cycles .
E) The quality of films released in September and October of last year was particularly poor.


Surely the answer comes down to options C and D. But D gets cancelled out because D says that the rise and falls are predictable but the premise in the stimulus says that the film goers in October last year dropped than the average of the preceding year's average. So how can it be predictable. Hence I would go for the option C as it fits perfectly and does not take only one stand in the stimulus.
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:27 pm
But nakulgar! what is the OA. Please mention the OA by using the spoiler, so that we do not have to go back to the same question again and again...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by nakulgar » Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:24 am
OA is C
Join the discussion