BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mothers and Babies

Expert replies
by tritrantran » Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:30 pm
Medical researcher: As expected, records covering
the last four years of ten major hospitals
indicate that babies born prematurely were
more likely to have low birth weights and to
suffer from health problems than were babies
not born prematurely. These records also
indicate that mothers who had received
adequate prenatal care were less likely to have
low birth weight babies than were mothers who
had received inadequate prenatal care.
Adequate prenatal care, therefore, significantly
decreases the risk of low birth weight babies.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the
medical researcher’s argument?

(A) The hospital records indicate that many babies
that are born with normal birth weights are
born to mothers who had inadequate prenatal
care.

(B) Mothers giving birth prematurely are routinely
classified by hospitals as having received
inadequate prenatal care when the record of
that care is not available.

(C) The hospital records indicate that low birth
weight babies were routinely classified as
having been born prematurely.

(D) Some babies not born prematurely, whose
mothers received adequate prenatal care,
have low birth weights.

(E) Women who receive adequate prenatal care are
less likely to give birth prematurely than are
women who do not receive adequate prenatal
care.

OA TBA
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pbanavara » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:11 pm
So :

Premature born babies -> low birth weight
Inadequate pre natal care -> premature born babies

Weaken the argument: Adequate prenatal care significantly increases low birth weight OR inadequate prenatal care significantly decreases low birth rate

Option D : Says it out .. some babies not born prematuresly and whose mothers received prenatal care - have low birth weights.

Option A also comes close - I was hard pressed to choose between these two and chose D.
In the land of night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
https://questor.blocked

GMATPREP1 - 550 (Oct 08)
MGMAT FREE CAT - 600 (Dec 08)
MGMAT CAT1 - 670 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT2 - 550 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT3 - 640 ( Feb 09)
MGMAT CAT4 - 660 ( Feb 09)
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:49 pm
I will go for "B".
Premature born babies -> low birth weight
Inadequate pre natal care -> premature born babies
Conclusion: Inadequate prenatal care --> Increase the risk of low birth weight babies.
To weaken this we have to show prenatal care is not the cause of low wt babies, but low wt is mainly because of premature babies

Option B clearly links these 2 pieces together.
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:23 pm
IMO B

cause and effect relation.

No parental care=== less weight babies

but if

less weight babies... --- no parental care..... this would weaken the argument.
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by tritrantran » Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:23 am
OA is B.
Join the discussion

by naveen.bobbili » Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:54 am
I am not able to decide between A and B.
I am not finding good reasons to eliminate A. Can somebody please help?
GMAT:580
Join the discussion

by casfguy » Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:17 pm
From A, There are some babies with abnormal weight.
So if have provided more adequate care for them,
we could improve there weight also.
It doesn't weaken argument.
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Fri May 13, 2016 2:50 am
i go with option B
Join the discussion