BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

'MOST WEAKEN' argument

Expert replies
by SeemaSkl » Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:21 pm
Converting vinyl records to CD or other digital formats makes little sense. Vinyl records, played on a high-quality, well-maintained turntable integrated with a top-grade audio systems produce a more natural sound than do their digital counterparts, since the latter use computer code to store and reproduce audio signals. Since human ears are, in fact, analog hearing devices, music enthusiasts will get the most realistic listening experience if they switch from CDs to vinyl records.

Which of the foll, if discovered to be true, would do most to weaken the above statements:

A. Most people who listen to music do not have access to high-end sound systems
B. Music enthusiasts are not always willing to pay top dollar for brand-name turntables.
C. analog audio systems are more expensive than are digital audio systems
D. Vinyl records are not nearly as portable or convineient as are digital music clips, which can be stored by the thousands on a keychain-sized device.
E. Many indivisuals are unable to discern any difference in fidelity between digital and analog music stores.


Answer is A acc. to Princeton. I think it is out of scope because the point is about getting a realistic listening experience rather than accesibility.
Choice E does not totally weaken the argument since it says 'many' indivisuals and not 'all' but the best choice acc. to me because if it is true, most people will have an equally realistic listening experience, weakening the conclusion.

ANYBODY AGREE/DISAGREE?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by SeemaSkl » Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:24 pm
Oops TYPO in E: last word is 'sources' not 'stores'
Join the discussion

by showbiz » Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:17 pm
SeemaSkl wrote:
Answer is A acc. to Princeton. I think it is out of scope because the point is about getting a realistic listening experience rather than accesibility.
Choice E does not totally weaken the argument since it says 'many' indivisuals and not 'all' but the best choice acc. to me because if it is true, most people will have an equally realistic listening experience, weakening the conclusion.

ANYBODY AGREE/DISAGREE?
You are right. Its a fight between Many and Much. My answer would be E as well. A is out of scope. BTW. Princeton is stupid.
Join the discussion

by SeemaSkl » Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:45 pm
Thanks and good luck for your GMAT.
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:04 pm
My pick was A

OA please...
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:18 pm
My initial pick was E. However, I didn't understand how OA is A?
SeemaSkl wrote:Converting vinyl records to CD or other digital formats makes little sense. Vinyl records, played on a high-quality, well-maintained turntable integrated with a top-grade audio systems produce a more natural sound than do their digital counterparts, since the latter use computer code to store and reproduce audio signals. Since human ears are, in fact, analog hearing devices, music enthusiasts will get the most realistic listening experience if they switch from CDs to vinyl records.

Which of the foll, if discovered to be true, would do most to weaken the above statements:

A. Most people who listen to music do not have access to high-end sound systems
B. Music enthusiasts are not always willing to pay top dollar for brand-name turntables.
C. analog audio systems are more expensive than are digital audio systems
D. Vinyl records are not nearly as portable or convineient as are digital music clips, which can be stored by the thousands on a keychain-sized device.
E. Many indivisuals are unable to discern any difference in fidelity between digital and analog music stores.


Answer is A acc. to Princeton. I think it is out of scope because the point is about getting a realistic listening experience rather than accesibility.
Choice E does not totally weaken the argument since it says 'many' indivisuals and not 'all' but the best choice acc. to me because if it is true, most people will have an equally realistic listening experience, weakening the conclusion.

ANYBODY AGREE/DISAGREE?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:41 pm
SeemaSkl wrote:Converting vinyl records to CD or other digital formats makes little sense. Vinyl records, played on a high-quality, well-maintained turntable integrated with a top-grade audio systems produce a more natural sound than do their digital counterparts, since the latter use computer code to store and reproduce audio signals. Since human ears are, in fact, analog hearing devices, music enthusiasts will get the most realistic listening experience if they switch from CDs to vinyl records.

Which of the foll, if discovered to be true, would do most to weaken the above statements:

A. Most people who listen to music do not have access to high-end sound systems
B. Music enthusiasts are not always willing to pay top dollar for brand-name turntables.
C. analog audio systems are more expensive than are digital audio systems
D. Vinyl records are not nearly as portable or convineient as are digital music clips, which can be stored by the thousands on a keychain-sized device.
E. Many indivisuals are unable to discern any difference in fidelity between digital and analog music stores.


Answer is A acc. to Princeton. I think it is out of scope because the point is about getting a realistic listening experience rather than accesibility.
Choice E does not totally weaken the argument since it says 'many' indivisuals and not 'all' but the best choice acc. to me because if it is true, most people will have an equally realistic listening experience, weakening the conclusion.

ANYBODY AGREE/DISAGREE?
In making the conclusion "converting tape to digital makes little sense", the author assumes that most of the music lovers have the systems mentioned in the armaments avaliable to them.

A is the logical negation of this assumption.
Join the discussion

by seshadrivyas » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:39 am
This is a very tricky one and I got it right. Here is the reason why A is the answer.

E - Nothing wrong with this choice, except that it contradicts a premise given in the question. Despite its logical absurdity, we have to assume that the human ear finds acoustic music better to hear.

A - It makes a point that directly conflicts with what is stated in the passage. On the GMAT such choices always take precedence over the choices like E.
The question stem says that Vinyl records played on a 'high-quality and well-maintained' device produces a sound that is more familiar to the ear. Only if people do not have access to such devices, we can make a case for the conversion to CD.

Its a very good question. More such ones please.
Join the discussion

by SeemaSkl » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:33 am
mmmm...I would disagree - I still think A takes the argument out of scope by bringing 'accessibility' into the picture. E weakens the argument while staying within scope which makes it the best ans. choice. Also, A is not a premise like you say as it is not stated anywhere in the argument. If anything, it would be an assumption BUT an assumption which is not necessary to make in order to arrive at the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:00 am
SeemaSkl wrote:mmmm...I would disagree - I still think A takes the argument out of scope by bringing 'accessibility' into the picture. E weakens the argument while staying within scope which makes it the best ans. choice. Also, A is not a premise like you say as it is not stated anywhere in the argument. If anything, it would be an assumption BUT an assumption which is not necessary to make in order to arrive at the conclusion.
Assumption is absolutely necessary to arrive at a conclusion.
If it was not the case, no negation test would exist. So pls revise your notes.
Join the discussion

by SeemaSkl » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 am
You misunderstand - Of course assumption can be necessary to arrive at THE conclusion (stated IN the passage) but not just ANY conclusion (NOT stated IN the passage).
Join the discussion