BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

More X & Y variables

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sudhir3127 » Sat Aug 16, 2008 8:28 pm
Ru sure the second statement is right....i feel it shd be (x+y)^2.. please us know
Join the discussion

Re: More X & Y variables

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:47 pm
smclean23 wrote:If xy = -6 , what is the value of xy(x+y ) ?
(1) x – y = 5
(2) xy^2=18


Answer is B.
(1) 2 equations and 2 unknowns, but xy = -6 isn't linear, so we'll get more than 1 value: insuffcient.

(2) 2 equations and 2 unknowns, but x(y^2) = 18 isn't linear. HOWEVER, we can actually divide the equation in (2) by the original to get:

x(y^2)/xy = 18/-6
y = -3

Once we know that y = -3, we know that x = 2 (from either equation). Once we have values for both x and y, we can certainly solve: statement (2) is sufficient alone, choose (B).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by sudhir3127 » Sat Aug 16, 2008 11:53 pm
hey sorrie abt misunderstanding the question!!!..I thought its(Xy)^2.. actually its x(y)^2.. a bracket there would have eliminated the confusion,...Anyways... if that the case I go with B as well.. exactly the way stuart did it.. U need to find Y and we can do it from taking the original eqn and statement 2.

thanks stuart!!
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sun Aug 17, 2008 3:47 am
I think B:

(1) obviously insuff.
(2) xy^2=18. Prime factorization of 18 is 2*3^2, but from the main statement we know that x or y is negative (because their product is negative). Thus, we have xyy=18=2*(-3)*(-3)
x+y=2+(-3)=-1. xy(x+y)=(-6)(-1)=6
Answer is B
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Aug 17, 2008 4:36 pm
4meonly wrote:I think B:

(1) obviously insuff.
(2) xy^2=18. Prime factorization of 18 is 2*3^2, but from the main statement we know that x or y is negative (because their product is negative). Thus, we have xyy=18=2*(-3)*(-3)
x+y=2+(-3)=-1. xy(x+y)=(-6)(-1)=6
Answer is B
One thing you always need to be careful about is making assumptions in DS.

If the ONLY thing we knew from the original was that x or y is negative, 2 wouldn't have been sufficient - because one thing we're never told is that x and y have to be integers. Even if they had to be integers, prime factorization wouldn't be enough without knowing the actual value of xy.

For example, why couldn't x = -18 and y = 1?

It's only because we know that xy = -6 (i.e. we know the actual value, not just the sign) that we can solve.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by anksbhandari » Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:01 am
I think D,

A is sufficient if we plug the value;

ab = -6

here ab can be = 1, -6 $ 2,-3

x - y = 5

only 2 - (-3) = 5

therefore, a = 2, and b = -3

sufficient to answer the problem

In the same way B is also sufficient

Therefore answer is D

Let me know if i am wrong
Join the discussion