BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

more ds from gmat prep

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:25 pm
Thanked: 1 times
by xcise_science » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:42 pm
q18,
stmt 1: 6=x+y
stmt 2: 130=.23x + .21y
Why is B the answer? I thought you can't solve if you have 2 variables and 1 equation

Image

q33

Image

q6
I just guessed that C was the answer to this, I didn't really understand stmt2

Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:36 pm

by syv11 » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:50 pm
q18

23x+21y=130

you know that x and y have to be integers; the only set of numbers that solves for 130 total price is x=2 and y=4

Therefore B

If you did not know that x and y have to be integers, you were right
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:36 pm

by syv11 » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:59 pm
q33

1993 1000
1994 1000*(1+x/100)
1995 1000*(1+x/100)*(1+y/100)=1000*(1+x/100+y/100+xy/10000)

(1) not enough
(2) enough so solution is 1000*(1+9.2/100)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:36 pm

by syv11 » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:59 pm
q 33 ==> B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:36 pm

by syv11 » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:06 pm
q6

(1) alone is not sufficient, does not tell us anything about (u,v)
(2) try to insert number in 1:

could be u=5, r=-4 and v=5, s=-4 i.e not equidistant or
u=2, r=-1 and v=-1, r=2 i.e. equidistant

If you combine that with statement (1) you will see that all pairs are equidistant; just try a couple more numbers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:25 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by xcise_science » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:30 pm
re: q18
oh, so when I have an unequal # of variables & equations I can guess/plug in as long as I know the variables are integers?

Thats good to know.

thanks
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:25 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by xcise_science » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:36 pm
Thank.
Can you explain this part:
how did you go from here:
1995 1000*(1+x/100)*(1+y/100)=1000*(1+x/100+y/100+xy/10000)
TO:
(2) enough so solution is 1000*(1+9.2/100)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:36 pm

by syv11 » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:44 pm
1995 1000*(1+x/100)*(1+y/100)=1000*(1+[b]x/100+y/100+xy/10000[/b]) ==> the number in the parenthesis is just multiplying out (1+x/100)*(1+y/100)

Then, you have given x+y+xy/100=9.2 ==> divide by 100 and you get

[b]x/100+y/100+xy/1000=0.092[/b] ==> replace this in the first line and you get

1000*(1+0.092)

Is this clear?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:25 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by xcise_science » Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:01 pm
barely.

let me ask you, if you saw this question on the test, how long will it take you
to work out this explanation? Also, did you see from stmt 2 that it might be sufficient or was it while doing the calculations, that you determined B was sufficient?


Thanks
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1