Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Money per mile

Expert replies
by rseeker2 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:00 pm
State spokesperson: Many businesspeople who have not been to our state believe that we have an inadequate
road system. Those people are mistaken, as is obvious from the fact that in each of the past six years, our state
has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the spokesperson’s argument?

(A) In the spokesperson’s state, spending on road improvements has been increasing more slowly over the past
six years than it has in several other states.
(B) Adequacy of a state’s road system is generally less important to a businessperson considering doing
business there than is the availability of qualified employees.
(C) Over the past six years, numerous businesses have business have moved into the state.
(D) In general, the number of miles of road in a state’ road system depends on both the area and the population
of the state.
(E) Only states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts of money on road
improvements.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by geet » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:12 pm
IMO E
Join the discussion

Re: Money per mile

by vinaynp » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:23 pm
We need to showcase that state has inadequate road system.

A) Other state is OOS.
B) We are not talking about doing businesses.
C) Business moving doesn't prove that state has an inadequate
road system.
D) Additional Information.

IMO E) proves that state has inadequate road system.
Join the discussion

by rseeker2 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:55 pm
But the question states
'our state has spent more money per mile on road'...

It does not specify how much more it is when compared to other states... The other states too might be spending pretty close to what this state is spending, but marginally less... When the question does not say 'large', but only 'more', how can we pick E? The other states too might be spending 'large' amounts, but slightly less when compared to the state in discussion...


I picked D...
Because if the area and population of a state are the determinants, then when the state just says 'it is spending more' when compared to the other states, it might actually be not doing enough... perhaps its area and population are so large that it cannot be directly compared with the other states...


Kindly help.
Join the discussion

Re: Money per mile

by Vemuri » Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:26 pm
IMO E
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:47 am
rseeker2 wrote:But the question states
'our state has spent more money per mile on road'...

It does not specify how much more it is when compared to other states... The other states too might be spending pretty close to what this state is spending, but marginally less... When the question does not say 'large', but only 'more', how can we pick E? The other states too might be spending 'large' amounts, but slightly less when compared to the state in discussion...


I picked D...
Because if the area and population of a state are the determinants, then when the state just says 'it is spending more' when compared to the other states, it might actually be not doing enough... perhaps its area and population are so large that it cannot be directly compared with the other states...


Kindly help.
First of all, we are not concerned about what other states are doing. The argument is concerned with why businesses are reluctant to establish themselves in Spokesperson's state.

Spokesperson says that state is spending large amounts to get the road system better. We need to attack the opposite effect, i.e. what if poor road system is the reason for chucking out huge sums of money. In that case, businesspeople would be right in saying that, "Hey, your roads were pathetic, that is why we are not in your state".
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:05 pm
I am leaning more towards E, but I'm not sure about it.
Join the discussion