BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Modifier

Expert replies
by yellowho » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:20 am
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.

a. movies-less than those
b. movies-fewer than have been
c. movies, which is less than those
d. movies, a number lower than the people
e. movies, fewer than the ones

Can someone explain the structure of this sentence?

"Only seven people this century...shark" (main clause)
COMMA+"the man....movies" (Appositive to "shark")
DASH+"fewer than have been...stings" (modifier seven people)


Structure: Main clause, modifier of an item in the main clause, modifier of the subject of the main clause.

1) Is this the right way of thinking about this structure?
2) Can the last modifier be that far away from the intended item?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by HSPA » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:11 am
a. movies-less than those
b. movies-fewer than have been
c. movies, which is less than those
d. movies, a number lower than the people
e. movies, fewer than the ones
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:06 am
yellowho wrote:Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.

a. movies-less than those
b. movies-fewer than have been
c. movies, which is less than those
d. movies, a number lower than the people
e. movies, fewer than the ones

2) Can the last modifier be that far away from the intended item?
Yes, it can be.

Look the "the man-eater of the movies" is just a non-essential modifier (NEM). It means that we can eliminate this NEM without losing the grammatical accuracy of the sentence.

Again, a single dash has been used before the second modifier, which has helped to modify the subject of the clause. If COMMA were used, it can be messy.

I would request you to read the following two things in details:

1. Use of single dash. [read some sentences from nytimes, WSJ, and Washingtonpost.]
2. Read the type of modifier.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:08 pm
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.

Can be rewriiten as by ignoring the fillers:

Only seven people have been killed, a number lower than the people killed by bee stings. (option D)

a number lower than the people modifies the subject seven people.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:32 am
gmatmachoman wrote:Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.

Can be rewriiten as by ignoring the fillers:

Only seven people have been killed, a number lower than the people killed by bee stings. (option D)

a number lower than the people modifies the subject seven people.
Hmm. I wouldn't have chosen that, as it renames "people" as "a number."
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:41 am
So is it OA is D, I feel it should be E.

a. movies-less than those : less than not appropeiate for such comparison
c. movies, which is less than those : which referring to movie, nonsensical.
d. movies, a number lower than the people : Issue as number vs people
e. movies, fewer than the ones : coudn't see much issue except use of "one's" not consistent.
b. movies-fewer than have been : have been?

Jim@Grockit wrote:
gmatmachoman wrote:Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.

Can be rewriiten as by ignoring the fillers:

Only seven people have been killed, a number lower than the people killed by bee stings. (option D)

a number lower than the people modifies the subject seven people.
Hmm. I wouldn't have chosen that, as it renames "people" as "a number."
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by nikhilsrl » Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:45 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1