State lawmakers are considering a law allowing children of divorced parents as young as seven to choose the parent with whom they will live, which will likely dissuade those parents from disciplining or punishing their children.
A. allowing children of divorced parents as young as seven to choose the parent with whom they will live, which will likely dissuade those parents
B. that would allow children as young as seven whose parents are divorced to choose the parent with whom they will live, a policy that would likely dissuade those parents
C. that would allow children of divorced parents as young as seven to choose the parent that they will live with, a policy that will likely dissuade their parents
D. allowing children as young as seven whose parents are divorced to choose the parent who they will live with, likely dissuading those parents
E. that will allow children as young as seven with divorced parents to choose which parent with whom to live, a policy likely dissuading their parents
The OA is B
In the end I understand that the other choices are worse than the OA but I got confused by the "considering a law that ..., a policy that ... " Is that really parallel? Shouldn't it be just considering a law that ..., and that ... "
A. allowing children of divorced parents as young as seven to choose the parent with whom they will live, which will likely dissuade those parents
B. that would allow children as young as seven whose parents are divorced to choose the parent with whom they will live, a policy that would likely dissuade those parents
C. that would allow children of divorced parents as young as seven to choose the parent that they will live with, a policy that will likely dissuade their parents
D. allowing children as young as seven whose parents are divorced to choose the parent who they will live with, likely dissuading those parents
E. that will allow children as young as seven with divorced parents to choose which parent with whom to live, a policy likely dissuading their parents
The OA is B
In the end I understand that the other choices are worse than the OA but I got confused by the "considering a law that ..., a policy that ... " Is that really parallel? Shouldn't it be just considering a law that ..., and that ... "
