BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

modifictaion

Expert replies
by thephoenix » Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:09 am
added to worries about budget cuts and cost of living increases , the administrators of public health care facilities must contend with the possibility of a strike by emplyoees.
a)same
b)added to budget cuts and increases in the cost of living
c)in addition to worry about cuts in the budget and and as the cost of living increases
d)added to their worrying about budget cuts and cost of living increases
e)in addition to worrying about budget cuts and increases in the cost of living

support your ans
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rockeyb » Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:45 am
thephoenix wrote:added to worries about budget cuts and cost of living increases , the administrators of public health care facilities must contend with the possibility of a strike by emplyoees.
a)same
b)added to budget cuts and increases in the cost of living
c)in addition to worry about cuts in the budget and and as the cost of living increases
d)added to their worrying about budget cuts and cost of living increases
e)in addition to worrying about budget cuts and increases in the cost of living

support your ans
My pick here is C .

Budget cuts - is not a type of cuts , we need the preposition IN to have a clearer meaning .

Ex : Boston Soldier - dose not make sense we need to say A soldier FROM Boston .

Similarly Arabian Sea Salt - also dose not make sense we have to say Salt FROM Arabia Sea .

Thus we can not eliminate the preposition IN and the correct from should be cuts IN the budget and not budget cuts .

This eliminates A , B , D and E .

Please correct me if I am wrong .
Last edited by rockeyb on Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by clickclickdecker » Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:02 am
"Contend with the possibility of a strike by employees" refers to an activity (to contend with sth.) . Therefore, the first part of the sentence should concern an activity as well. Thus, we need a verb. That leaves C (if worry is understood as a verb), D and E.
"budget cuts" is a perfect English idiom. There is no need to correct that. Eliminate C.

"In addition to worrying" is the proper idiom (In addition to + Gerund). Also, "increases in the cost of living" is better than "cost of living increases" as "cost of living" is a phrase, which means it can't be combined with a noun without a preposition.

Answer: E
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:33 am
clickclickdecker wrote:"Contend with the possibility of a strike by employees" refers to an activity (to contend with sth.) . Therefore, the first part of the sentence should concern an activity as well. Thus, we need a verb. That leaves C (if worry is understood as a verb), D and E.
"budget cuts" is a perfect English idiom. There is no need to correct that. Eliminate C.

"In addition to worrying" is the proper idiom (In addition to + Gerund). Also, "increases in the cost of living" is better than "cost of living increases" as "cost of living" is a phrase, which means it can't be combined with a noun without a preposition.

Answer: E
Correct me if I'm wrong.
+1 for E.
However, I am not really ok with "In addition to worrying"; ""In addition to worry" in C looks better. Also, I see the flow breaking due to "and as" in C.
"cost of living increases" in C is suspicious too.

OA pls ?
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by Fiver » Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:23 am
Agree with E
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:31 am
rockeyb wrote:
My pick here is C .
c)in addition to worry about cuts in the budget and and as the cost of living increases
look for the ||ism indicator and . (X and Y ). X and Y should be ||.

in C :

X = Budget cuts (noun)
Y= as the cost of living increases (not noun)

Not parallel. Not to be picked. :)

Also, in this question, you are actually correcting a modifying clause, which modifies the administrators. So, if you look closely, only C (partially) and E do that job.

C can be eliminated on the basis of reasons stated above. Hence, E would be the correct answer.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:25 am
Well harsha my man I have to disagree here with you .

As per your explanation :
look for the ||ism indicator and . (X and Y ). X and Y should be ||.

in C :
X = Budget cuts (noun)
Y= as the cost of living increases (not noun)
So X and Y need to be parallel .

Lets look at E :

in addition to worrying about budget cuts and increases in the cost of living

X : worrying about budget cuts - participle phrase acting as ADJECTIVE qualifying the noun administrators .

Y : increases in the cost of living - is a noun phrase .

So can these be called parallel ?

I agree with you on one point that the sentence is checking for modifiers and only C and E do the job .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:17 am
guys OA is E
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:33 am
rockeyb wrote:Well harsha my man I have to disagree here with you .

As per your explanation :
look for the ||ism indicator and . (X and Y ). X and Y should be ||.

in C :
X = Budget cuts (noun)
Y= as the cost of living increases (not noun)
So X and Y need to be parallel .

Lets look at E :

in addition to worrying about budget cuts and increases in the cost of living

X : worrying about budget cuts - participle phrase acting as ADJECTIVE qualifying the noun administrators .

Y : increases in the cost of living - is a noun phrase .

So can these be called parallel ?

I agree with you on one point that the sentence is checking for modifiers and only C and E do the job .
rockyb,

The parallel elements that you have to look for are :
e)in addition to worrying about budget cuts and increases in the cost of living
X = Budget cuts (noun)
Y= increases in the cost of living (noun phrase)

The administrators already worry about X
and
The administrators already worry about Y.

So, worrying about applies to both X and Y and should included in both while comparison.

In addition, they now have to worry about the possibility of strike.

Let me know if it is still hazy :)
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:47 am
Harsha ,

Your explanation makes sense but I am still not sure if C is wrong .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:38 pm
rockeyb wrote:Harsha ,

Your explanation makes sense but I am still not sure if C is wrong .
OE says C is actually two complete s/c incorrectly connected with a comma.You wud need a period after 'feet" and a capital I in "in"

i cud not understand this; any one pls help me to understand it
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1