BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MIXTURE PROBLEM

Expert replies
by amitdgr » Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Q) In what proportion can 3 varieties of sugar priced at $10, $12 and $18 per kg, be mixed so that the price of the resultant mixture is $14 per kg?

A) 2:2:5
B) 2:3:4
C) 1:3:4
D) 3:4:5
E) 1:2:8

Please help how to approach. I will post the correct answer afterwards.

Thanks
Amit
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by pepeprepa » Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:33 am
Once again that is not an academic one method. Here is how I did it:

x: quantity of sugar at $10 in kg
y: quantity of sugar at $12 in kg
z: quantity of sugar at $18 in kg

(10x+12y+18z)/(x+y+z)=14
0=4x+2y-4z
2z=2x+y

And you try each of the possible answers to find which of them respects the equation.

When you are on D) it gives you 2*5=2*3+4
Then D)
Takes you less than one minute.
Join the discussion

by egybs » Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:24 am
agreed with pepeprepa on this... just do some trial and error.

But there is one thing you could do which would narrow your choices down to a couple to test:

Looking at 10, 12 and 18.. and knowing that we need 14 as an average. You can basically see that if there were no $12s you'd need an equal number of 10s and 18s to get an average of 14 (since (10+18)/2 = 14). From there, if you were to substitute some of the 10s for 12s, you'll see that you'll need a smaller number of 18s to get that same 14 average.

So what does this mean? The number of 10s and 12s should, together, be more than the number of 18s.

Another way to look at it is that if you were combine only the 10s and 12s, the lowest the average could be is 10 and the highest 12. If it was 10, there would be a 1:1 ration with the 18s.. and if the average was 12, there would be a 2:1 ration with 18s. Of course we're looking for something in between.

In any case, this can eliminate choices A, C, and E... So you'd only need to test B and D.

Of course, if you were to realize this, you'd only really save 20-30 seconds.. so it's not the end of the world if you don't.
Join the discussion

thanks guys

by amitdgr » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:48 am
Yes thats the right answer :)

@ pepeprepa - Thanks a lot buddy. Don't know why it did not strike me :)

@ egybs - Thanks for that perspective :)
Join the discussion