BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mimic the reasoning

Expert replies
by ritika_bsg » Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:13 am
If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the lower-ranked player always loses the tiebreak (and, therefore, the match). If Rafael, the second-ranked player, wins a tournament by beating Roger, the top-ranked player, then the match must not have included a fifth-set tiebreak.

Which of the following arguments most closely mimics the reasoning used in the above argument?

If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, she will have one set of twins. Jennifer, who falls into this category, had two sets of twins, so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times.

If a salesman sells more product than anyone else in a calendar year, then he will earn an all-expenses-paid vacation. Joe earned an all-expense-paid vacation, so he must have sold more product than anyone else for the year.

A newspaper can charge a 50% premium for ads if its circulation surpasses 100,000; if the circulation does not pass 100,000, therefore, the newspaper can't charge any kind of premium for ads.

If a student is in the top 10% of her class, she will earn a college scholarship. Anna is not in the top 10% of her class, so she will not earn a scholarship.

All of the players on a football team receive a cash bonus if the team wins the Super Bowl. If quarterback Tom Brady earned a cash bonus last year, he must have been a member of the winning Super Bowl team.

OA A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rapper » Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:01 am
The argument is if in TT 5th set(a) then LowerRank(b) loses
R(2nd)rank wins and beats 1st rank then 5th not reached.
Here the realtion is if a happens then b happens and b has not happened so the a will not happen.
i hope you would be able to get the relation.
I think the mimic argument should be C.
Dax d Rapper...
Join the discussion

by ritika_bsg » Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:32 am
OA is A .i had selected B .. not sure how it is A .
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:33 pm
So this one is not an official question! They do not have a question about Nadal and Federer on the GMAT. However I did write an article about these two called "Why Federer would beat Nadal on the GMAT." You should read it! https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/01/ ... n-the-gmat

As to this mimic question. You need to map it out in abstract language so no reference to tennis or to fifth set or anything like that. You want a logical framework that can be applied to the answer choice as well.

So in the stimulus we have a result that always occurs (lower ranked loses) if a certain scenario is met (fifth set tie-breaker). The result did not occur (lower ranked player won) so the scenario must not have been met.

Let me state this again so we know what we are looking for in the answer choice. If a given scenario is met then a specific result will happen. The result did not happen so the scenario must not have been met.

Answer choice A fits this exactly. If the scenario is met(women with family history of twins gets pregnant three times) then the result will happen (one set of twins). The result did not happen (more than now set of twins so not exactly one set) and therefore the scenario was not met (the women must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times).

Answer Choice B does not meet this. In B the result is realized (all-expenses vacation) and so the scenario must have been met (sold the most product). But this is the opposite of the stimulus where the result does NOT happen and the scenario is NOT met.

Does that help?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by rapper » Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:42 pm
David@VeritasPrep wrote:So this one is not an official question! They do not have a question about Nadal and Federer on the GMAT. However I did write an article about these two called "Why Federer would beat Nadal on the GMAT." You should read it! https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/01/ ... n-the-gmat

As to this mimic question. You need to map it out in abstract language so no reference to tennis or to fifth set or anything like that. You want a logical framework that can be applied to the answer choice as well.

So in the stimulus we have a result that always occurs (lower ranked loses) if a certain scenario is met (fifth set tie-breaker). The result did not occur (lower ranked player won) so the scenario must not have been met.

Let me state this again so we know what we are looking for in the answer choice. If a given scenario is met then a specific result will happen. The result did not happen so the scenario must not have been met.

Answer choice A fits this exactly. If the scenario is met(women with family history of twins gets pregnant three times) then the result will happen (one set of twins). The result did not happen (more than now set of twins so not exactly one set) and therefore the scenario was not met (the women must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times).

Answer Choice B does not meet this. In B the result is realized (all-expenses vacation) and so the scenario must have been met (sold the most product). But this is the opposite of the stimulus where the result does NOT happen and the scenario is NOT met.

Does that help?
yes thanks for ur help.. :)
Dax d Rapper...
Join the discussion