Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Military contract

Expert replies
by ronnie1985 » Sun May 20, 2012 10:05 am
The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors
is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing." Historical costing allows
contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate
of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as
an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?
A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the
products.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military
contracts.
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of
innovative weapons.

OA after some discussion
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatblood » Sun May 20, 2012 11:21 am
We need to find ways which will undermine historical costing!

IMO: B
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:41 am
(E) is right

I was wondering what's wrong with (A) which says that the inefficiencies are carried over to next stage in the current system of awarding contracts
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon May 21, 2012 8:07 am
Doubt it to be E
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Fri May 25, 2012 12:36 pm
Clearly, it's A
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Sat May 26, 2012 6:40 am
msr4mba wrote:Clearly, it's A
Can you explain??? why (E) is more appropriate than (A)
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Tue May 29, 2012 10:24 am
The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors
is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing." Historical costing allows
contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate
of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as
an economically sound pricing method
for military contracts?

A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds. (OOS)

B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years. OOS
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the
products. Contender what if the material earlier used was high cost and now it is a very cheap material. The contractor will keep taking a more money for a relatively inexpensive weapons. Remember we need to address economic issue.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military
contracts. OOS
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of
innovative weapons. OOS
Join the discussion

by jimmyjimmy » Sat Jun 02, 2012 8:30 pm
E is fine,,..

coz contractors are never gonna suffer loss, because their profit is protected,
when they r getting profit, there will b no innovation....

(other competing firm who does not get contracts, will bring some change in its weapons so that it can say that "we have so and so power weapons" ,.,. )

here we r talking about only 1 firm, and if it gets business it is never gonna improve its quality or power of weapons..

HIH!!
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:19 am
ronnie1985 wrote:
msr4mba wrote:Clearly, it's A
Can you explain??? why (E) is more appropriate than (A)
Here you go -
https://www.beatthegmat.com/historical-c ... 14159.html
Join the discussion