BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Military contract

Expert replies
by ronnie1985 » Sun May 20, 2012 10:05 am
The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors
is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing." Historical costing allows
contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate
of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as
an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?
A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the
products.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military
contracts.
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of
innovative weapons.

OA after some discussion
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatblood » Sun May 20, 2012 11:21 am
We need to find ways which will undermine historical costing!

IMO: B
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Mon May 21, 2012 6:41 am
(E) is right

I was wondering what's wrong with (A) which says that the inefficiencies are carried over to next stage in the current system of awarding contracts
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon May 21, 2012 8:07 am
Doubt it to be E
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Fri May 25, 2012 12:36 pm
Clearly, it's A
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Sat May 26, 2012 6:40 am
msr4mba wrote:Clearly, it's A
Can you explain??? why (E) is more appropriate than (A)
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Tue May 29, 2012 10:24 am
The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors
is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing." Historical costing allows
contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate
of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as
an economically sound pricing method
for military contracts?

A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds. (OOS)

B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years. OOS
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the
products. Contender what if the material earlier used was high cost and now it is a very cheap material. The contractor will keep taking a more money for a relatively inexpensive weapons. Remember we need to address economic issue.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military
contracts. OOS
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of
innovative weapons. OOS
Join the discussion

by jimmyjimmy » Sat Jun 02, 2012 8:30 pm
E is fine,,..

coz contractors are never gonna suffer loss, because their profit is protected,
when they r getting profit, there will b no innovation....

(other competing firm who does not get contracts, will bring some change in its weapons so that it can say that "we have so and so power weapons" ,.,. )

here we r talking about only 1 firm, and if it gets business it is never gonna improve its quality or power of weapons..

HIH!!
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:19 am
ronnie1985 wrote:
msr4mba wrote:Clearly, it's A
Can you explain??? why (E) is more appropriate than (A)
Here you go -
https://www.beatthegmat.com/historical-c ... 14159.html
Join the discussion