BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Military applications

Expert replies
by crackgmat007 » Fri May 22, 2009 7:56 pm
Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere. In this case, therefore, since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the author’s argument relies?
A. None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product.
B. It would cost more to convert the production lines of the small companies to a new set of manufacturing specifications than it would to convert the production lines of the large companies.
C. Industry lobbyists will be unable to dissuade the government from regulating the industry.
D. Assembly of the product produced according to government manufacturing specifications would be more complex than current assembly procedures.
E. None of the seven small companies currently manufactures the product to a set of specifications that would match those the government would institute if the industry were to be regulated.

IMO - B but OA is - E pls explain
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Fri May 22, 2009 9:47 pm
A. out of scope. what would happen if the govt. did not regulate is not important

B. negate: even if the cost to the small cos. were same as the cost to the big cos. the small cos. may still not have been able to afford the conversion-would have gone out of business- doesnt affect the argument

C. out of scope

D. whether assembly of products is complex is out of scope

E. negate: some of the small companies currently manufactures the products that would match the specifications of the govt. if the regulations come in effect=>they wouldnt need to convert the product line=>they would remain in business=>the argument falls apart.
E is therefore necessary for the argument and is the assumption
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Fri May 22, 2009 10:54 pm
The passage concludes that large companies would survive and small companies won't. we are supposed to find an assumption that supports this conclusion.

Whether the large ones would go out of business if the market isn't regulated can't be an assumption on which we can draw the above conclusion. Hence he answer can't be option A.

Relatice cost to small companies or large is of no use as an assumption. It is stated that small ones won't be able to afford it. Whether it is greater or smaller than the large ones is of no use. Hence not option B.

C can easily be ruled out.

D cant be as assuming the complexity is out of context.

Changing the lines of production certainly do indicate that it is already assumed that the present lines arent as per the to-be-imposed standards and specifications.
Hence the answer is E.
Sandy
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 7:48 pm
My intuition whispers that it is E
Join the discussion