BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

mgmatcr4

Expert replies
by stubbornp » Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:42 pm
The current administration and Congress have once again practiced bad public policy in failing to increase Pell grants or at least limit their reduction for next year’s budget. Pell grants improve access to higher education for those who have historically been disadvantaged in our society by financial or other life circumstances, thereby helping recipients elevate themselves to the middle class. Without that access, the gap between the rich and poor in this country will continue to widen, increasingly straining the stability of our democracy.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion of this argument?

Total spending on programs targeted at improving access to higher education for disadvantaged students will increase in next year’s federal budget.

The neediest candidates for Pell grants often lack information about their eligibility for such grants.

Congress recently authorized a bill that will increase after-school programs in urban communities.

On average, an individual Pell grant funds less than 15% of the full cost of attending a four-year college or university.

Federal spending on education for next year will increase as a percentage of the total budget.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Jatinder » Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:24 am
IMOA
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:36 am
imo:B

OA??
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:19 am
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:28 pm
Sure case of (B)
Drill baby drill !

GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:17 pm
Jatinder wrote:IMOA
Can you please explain B?

Is the staement-The current administration and Congress have once again practiced bad public policy in failing to increase Pell grants or at least limit their reduction for next year’s budget- not the conclusion of the arguemnt?

If Yes, then A directly targets the bold part of the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by stubbornp » Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:54 pm
I also chose B....but Guys,Answers is A...

Reason- Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:42 am Post subject: mgmatcr4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The current administration and Congress have once again practiced bad public policy in failing to increase Pell grants or at least limit their reduction for next year’s budget.

Check the bold part...If policy is bad,It doesnt matter whether needies lack information about their eligibility for such grants...Hope all of you understand...Thanks
Last edited by stubbornp on Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:39 am
imo A but with the following logic:

Conclusion: Without that access, the gap between the rich and poor in this country will continue to widen, increasingly straining the stability of our democracy.

Basically, the argument hints that without Pell grants there is no opportunity for disadvantaged students to attain higher education owing to lack of other programs.

Without what access? - access to programs targeted to provide disadvantaged students access to education.

Choice A states that there are other programs which provide disadvantaged students access to higher education i.e. serve the same purpose as Pell grants. Thus, refuting the original argument/weakening the conclusion.

Moreover, total spending in such programs will increase in the next year's budget.
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Thu May 12, 2016 11:54 am
I would go with option B as the correct option
Join the discussion