OA after a few reply. I'm not sure how this can be solved in under 2 min.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.
See classesLearn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.
Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.
with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep
Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.
with
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
You have the correct answer but I'm not sure how you converged onbww wrote:Is the answer 16/9?
I got this by taking into account that many right triangles have lengths of 3, 4, 5 or multiples of those numbers. In that case, the smaller triangle has lengths of 9, 12, and 15 while the larger triangle has lengths of 12, 16, and 20.
The perimeter then checks out: 20+15+25=60
Area of larger triangle to smaller triangle is 96:54 or 16:9.
Is there any way you can post this explaination?MGMAT has given an explanation that involves 14 steps of calculations
Here you goabbyyip wrote: Is there any way you can post this explaination?
What bww has used is called Pythagorean Triplets. These are sets of numbers numbers with a relation for pythagorean equation and quiet usefull. other sets are (5:12:13) (3:4:5) etc.bww wrote:Unfortunately, my only explanation is drawing from what I read during GMAT prep a few months ago. Apparently the Pythagorean triangle that appears most frequently on the exam are those with sides of lengths 3:4:5 or multiples of such. I spent probably 15+ minutes trying to figure out how to even approach this problem before I recalled that piece of info. Double checking took about 10 seconds as I plugged in the 3:4:5 proportions and then calculated the perimeter. Luckily, it worked out. Like I said, I was really stumped, but the 10 seconds I spent chasing an idea proved useful. Sorry I don't have a better explanation!