Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

MGMAT

Expert replies
by yuliawati » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:00 pm
Guys, please help! how to solve this problem?

A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 10 by 10 by 10. The top layer of cubes is removed from a face, then from the adjacent face above it, then from the adjacent face to the right of the first. The process is repeated on the same three faces in reverse order. Finally, a last layer is taken from the first face. How many smaller cubes have been removed from the larger cube?

(A) 488
(B) 552
(C) 612
(D) 722
(E) 900

OA later
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:28 am
I would probably just find what cube I have remaining, and subtract the new number of cubes from the 1000.
you start with 10*10*10.

Remove a top layer from the front, so the cube is only 9 cubes "wide": 10*9*10
shave a layer from the top face ("above it"), so the cube is only 9 cubes "high": 10*9*9
Now shave a layer from the side ("to the right of the first") so the cube is only 9 cubes "long": 9*9*9

Every time you shave a layer, you reduce 1 from one dimension, leaving the others as they are. Thus, if we repeat the process for all three dimensions (even in reverse order), we get 8*8*8. If we take another layer from the first face, we take another 1 from the width to get 8*7*8
How we call the dimensions "length, width height" does not really matter: the dynamic is the same, and the result will be two 8s and a 7.

Now the question asked how many have been removed, so the final answer is {original number - new number} = 10*10*10 - 8*8*7 = 1000 - 64*7 = 1000 - 448 = 552. Answer should be B.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by yuliawati » Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:30 am
Great!! thank Geva!
Join the discussion

by Anaira Mitch » Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:17 pm
We can answer this by keeping track of how many cubes are lopped off of each side as the cube is trimmed (10 x 10 + 10 x 9 + 9 x 9 + ...), but this approach is tedious and error prone. A more efficient method is to determine the final dimensions of the trimmed cube, then find the difference between the dimensions of the trimmed and original cubes.

Let's call the first face A, second face B, and third face C. By the end of the operation, we will have removed 2 layers each from faces B and C, and 3 layers from face A. So B now is 8 cubes long, C is 8 cubes long, and A is 7 cubes long. The resulting solid has dimensions 8 x 8 x 7 cubes or 448 cubes. We began with 1000 cubes, so 1000 - 448 = 552. Thus, 552 cubes have been removed.

The correct answer is B
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:19 pm
Here's a quick way:

We're removing three layers from the length, two layers from the width, and two layers from the height.

We originally had 10 * 10 * 10, but now we've got (10 - 3) * (10 - 2) * (10 - 2), or 448.

The difference between 1000 and 448 is the number that we've removed, so 1000 - 448, or 552.
Join the discussion