MGMAT

Expert replies

hey_thr67: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 299; Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:27 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 9 times

by hey_thr67 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:42 am

If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

A: If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

B:
If the human body's intake of carbohydrates are sufficiently low, it will enter ketosis, a state in which fat is directly burned rather than metabolizing glucose.

C:
In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

D:
In cases where carbohydrate intake is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which fat rather than glucose is directly metabolized.

E:
If the sufficient intake of carbohydrates is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which its metabolism burns not glucose but fat.

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:42 am

Jim@StratusPrep: MBA Admissions Consultant; Posts: 2279; Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 amFollowed by: 266 members; Location: New York; Thanked: 660 times; GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:56 am

A) the it could refer to human body or ketosis - incorrect
B) the first it refers to intake - incorrect
C) it has multiple references again and the comparison at the end is off
D) CORRECT
E) The beginning of the sentence makes no sense

In general there are a lot of pronoun issues and the word sufficient is not needed in any of the sentences.

GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Like this post

[email protected]: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 13; Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:59 am

by [email protected] » Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:08 am

Hi Jim,

The official answer is C
the answer "D. In cases where " is wrong because...where can only be used with physical location

However I see an issue with answer choice C
In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

the bold faced it above is ambiguous ..is it used for human body or ketosis>

Like this post

hey_thr67: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 299; Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:27 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 9 times

by hey_thr67 » Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:34 am

It can not refer to ketosis here. It is cleanly referring to human body. IMO is C.

Like this post

Bill@VeritasPrep: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 1248; Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pmFollowed by: 192 members; Location: Everywhere; Thanked: 503 times; GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:27 am

[email protected] wrote:Hi Jim,

The official answer is C
the answer "D. In cases where " is wrong because...where can only be used with physical location

However I see an issue with answer choice C
In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

the bold faced it above is ambiguous ..is it used for human body or ketosis>

"...ketosis, a state in which ketosis directly metabolizes..." does not make much sense, but "...ketosis, a state in which the human body directly metabolizes..." does. "It" can logically only refer to "the human body."

Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

Like this post

diebeatsthegmat: Legendary Member; Posts: 1119; Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members; Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:19 pm

[email protected] wrote:Hi Jim,

The official answer is C
the answer "D. In cases where " is wrong because...where can only be used with physical location

However I see an issue with answer choice C
In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

the bold faced it above is ambiguous ..is it used for human body or ketosis>

where do you find this question. it doesnt make any sense for me and i do not understand why C is wrong and i dont understand why D is right either. it doesnt make any sense for me for those answer choices

Like this post

abcgmat: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 222; Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:06 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 19 times

by abcgmat » Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:06 am

The OA seems to be C from 'viv.yadav' posts so i think you are correct
'[email protected] wrote:
Hi Jim,

The official answer is C
the answer "D. In cases where " is wrong because...where can only be used with physical location '

Like this post

stalwart2012: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 2; Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 7:26 am

by stalwart2012 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:35 am

Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:
"...ketosis, a state in which ketosis directly metabolizes..." does not make much sense, but "...ketosis, a state in which the human body directly metabolizes..." does. "It" can logically only refer to "the human body."

I understand that "human body" logically fits here. But we can't use logic to decide if its ambiguous or not? IMO the antecedent should be clear enough to point out the noun.

Like this post

Bill@VeritasPrep: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 1248; Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pmFollowed by: 192 members; Location: Everywhere; Thanked: 503 times; GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:06 pm

stalwart2012 wrote:
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:
"...ketosis, a state in which ketosis directly metabolizes..." does not make much sense, but "...ketosis, a state in which the human body directly metabolizes..." does. "It" can logically only refer to "the human body."
I understand that "human body" logically fits here. But we can't use logic to decide if its ambiguous or not? IMO the antecedent should be clear enough to point out the noun.

Why would we not use logic?

In any event, we can also use grammatical roles to differentiate. "Human body" is used as a subject, and "ketosis" is used as an object. "It" serves as a subject as well, so we can correctly link it to "human body."

Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

Like this post

GMATGuruNY: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 15539; Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members; Location: New York, NY; Thanked: 13060 times; GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:50 pm

hey_thr67 wrote:If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

A: If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

B:
If the human body's intake of carbohydrates are sufficiently low, it will enter ketosis, a state in which fat is directly burned rather than metabolizing glucose.

C:
In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

D:
In cases where carbohydrate intake is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which fat rather than glucose is directly metabolized.

E:
If the sufficient intake of carbohydrates is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which its metabolism burns not glucose but fat.

In A and E, sufficiently/sufficient and enough are redundant. Eliminate A and E.

In B, intake (singular) does not agree with are (plural). Eliminate B.

In D, where cannot be used to refer to CASES; where can refer only to a place. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is C.

In C, there is no doubt about the referent for IT:
The human body enters ketosis, a state in which IT directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.
Here, a state is in APPOSITION to ketosis.
Nouns in apposition refer to the SAME THING: ketosis = a state.
Thus, if IT were referring to ketosis, then the meaning conveyed would be the following:
KETOSIS is a state in which KETOSIS directly metabolizes fat.
This meaning makes no sense.
Further, the referent for which is A STATE, which in turn refers to KETOSIS.
How could which and it --two adjacent pronouns -- be referring to the same thing?
Clearly, IT refers to THE HUMAN BODY:
Ketosis is a state in which THE HUMAN BODY directly metabolizes fat.

Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Like this post

Jpp: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 8; Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:15 pmFollowed by: 1 member

by Jpp » Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:22 am

Hi Mitch -

The original version ->

If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

Option C ->

In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

In C, isn't the modifier marked in Bold changes the meaning to make it ambiguous.

Original version says " Human body metabolizes fat directly instead of using glucose to metabolizes fat - CORRECT?

Now Option C says "Human body directly metabolizes fat and doesn't not metabolizes glucose when in a state of ketosis"

Am i reading this one correctly?

Cheers

Like this post

Jpp: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 8; Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:15 pmFollowed by: 1 member

by Jpp » Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:25 am

GMATGuruNY wrote:
hey_thr67 wrote:If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

A: If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

B:
If the human body's intake of carbohydrates are sufficiently low, it will enter ketosis, a state in which fat is directly burned rather than metabolizing glucose.

C:
In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

D:
In cases where carbohydrate intake is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which fat rather than glucose is directly metabolized.

E:
If the sufficient intake of carbohydrates is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which its metabolism burns not glucose but fat.
In A and E, sufficiently/sufficient and enough are redundant. Eliminate A and E.

In B, intake (singular) does not agree with are (plural). Eliminate B.

In D, where cannot be used to refer to CASES; where can refer only to a place. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is C.

In C, there is no doubt about the referent for IT:
The human body enters ketosis, a state in which IT directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.
Here, a state is in APPOSITION to ketosis.
Nouns in apposition refer to the SAME THING: ketosis = a state.
Thus, if IT were referring to ketosis, then the meaning conveyed would be the following:
KETOSIS is a state in which KETOSIS directly metabolizes fat.
This meaning makes no sense.
Further, the referent for which is A STATE, which in turn refers to KETOSIS.
How could which and it --two adjacent pronouns -- be referring to the same thing?
Clearly, IT refers to THE HUMAN BODY:
Ketosis is a state in which THE HUMAN BODY directly metabolizes fat.

Like this post

gui_guimaraes: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 38; Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:22 am

Re:

by gui_guimaraes » Fri Jul 10, 2020 2:33 pm

GMATGuruNY wrote: ↑
Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:50 pm

hey_thr67 wrote:If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

A: If the intake of carbohydrates is sufficiently low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, where it metabolizes fat directly rather than using glucose.

B:
If the human body's intake of carbohydrates are sufficiently low, it will enter ketosis, a state in which fat is directly burned rather than metabolizing glucose.

C:
In the case of a sufficiently low carbohydrate intake, the human body enters ketosis, a state in which it directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.

D:
In cases where carbohydrate intake is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which fat rather than glucose is directly metabolized.

E:
If the sufficient intake of carbohydrates is low enough, the human body will enter ketosis, in which its metabolism burns not glucose but fat.
In A and E, sufficiently/sufficient and enough are redundant. Eliminate A and E.

In B, intake (singular) does not agree with are (plural). Eliminate B.

In D, where cannot be used to refer to CASES; where can refer only to a place. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is C.

In C, there is no doubt about the referent for IT:
The human body enters ketosis, a state in which IT directly metabolizes fat rather than glucose.
Here, a state is in APPOSITION to ketosis.
Nouns in apposition refer to the SAME THING: ketosis = a state.
Thus, if IT were referring to ketosis, then the meaning conveyed would be the following:
KETOSIS is a state in which KETOSIS directly metabolizes fat.
This meaning makes no sense.
Further, the referent for which is A STATE, which in turn refers to KETOSIS.
How could which and it --two adjacent pronouns -- be referring to the same thing?
Clearly, IT refers to THE HUMAN BODY:
Ketosis is a state in which THE HUMAN BODY directly metabolizes fat.

@GMATGuruNY Hi Mitch! In (D) and (E), the " , in which" is right? Or the correct way is to use the appositive "a state in which"? Tks!

Like this post

Post new topic Locked

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

559 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review