BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT Quantity Expression

Expert replies
by gmatblr » Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:05 am
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.
A twice as much as 1981
B twice as many as 1981
C double the figure for 1981
D double what it was in 1981
E a number double that of 1981’s

What does "twice as much as 1981" refer to .Does it refer to 42% or to 198,113

[spoiler]C
[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Suyog » Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:00 am
I think it refers to the number of female i.e. 198,113

the problem with this option is it compares the figure with 1981.
It shud have been right... if... it says..

twice as many as in 1981....
Join the discussion

by just_do_it » Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:28 am
"twice as many as IN 1981" should have been the correct answer here. but we do not have that as an option.

the only option that has "..in 1981" is option D, but i think the use of pronoun "it" makes it awkward because "it" does not have a clear antecedent.

Options A (unidiomatic), B(absence of "in") and E(awkward) are incorrect.

I would go for option C.

what is the OA ?
Join the discussion

similar to OG question

by kitrak » Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:59 pm
guys,


a similar question on OG11. SC #4. see the explanation, it'll help.

cheers!!!
Join the discussion

by dileepsinha » Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:37 am
Just do it,
In my opinion what maked D incorrect is the missing "of"
double of what it was in 1981
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1