BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT prep

Expert replies
by callmemo » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:15 am
In the past year, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of people killed by alligators in Florida. During this same time, there has been an increase in the development of new houses, golf courses, and shopping areas in former wilderness areas within the state. Therefore, the increase in fatal alligator attacks must have been caused by the increase in the number of humans living in the alligator’s habitat.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the explanation above?

A. Two years ago, a government initiative to reduce the alligator population size by destroying alligator eggs ended.
B. An increase in fatal alligator attacks tends to make people more cautious around lakes, ponds, swamps and canals.
C. The number of people killed by snake bites, spider bites and scorpion stings
D. Many of the new state residents have moved to newly constructed areas near water that is suitable for habitation by alligators.
E. The undeveloped areas of Florida have decreased in area by 5% in the past year.

[spoiler]OA: A[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mals24 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:25 pm
This argument describes a causal relationship.

increase in the number of humans living in the alligator’s habitat(C)---->increase in fatal alligator attacks(E)

We need to weaken this relationship.

A. Two years ago, a government initiative to reduce the alligator population size by destroying alligator eggs ended.

This gives another cause for the increase in alligator attacks. It says it might not be the increase in human settlement but increase in the alligator population that caused these increases in attacks. Plus since these attacks increased in the past one year, this matches the fact that the government ended its initiative to reduce alligator population 2 years ago.

B. An increase in fatal alligator attacks tends to make people more cautious around lakes, ponds, swamps and canals. Irrelevant. This doesn't help to weaken the causal relationship.

C. The number of people k!IIed by snake bites, spider bites and scorpion stings (incomplete sentence) but still irrelevant. No mention about alligators.

D. Many of the new state residents have moved to newly constructed areas near water that is suitable for habitation by alligators. strengthens the relationship.

E. The undeveloped areas of Florida have decreased in area by 5% in the past year. Irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Fri May 13, 2016 3:46 am
I like the explanation on A
Join the discussion