BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT - Harder on math, easier on verbal?

Expert replies
by cbenk121 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:22 pm
Took MGMAT #1 today, and felt like the math problems were harder than GMAT Prep. This didn't surprise me, because people on here had said those tests tend to be more difficult, but then verbal felt easier.

Sure enough, my math and verbal scores flipped: Q43 and V45.

Anyone else experience harder math/easier verbal questions? I'm not worried about the math scores going down (as this test was a series of mind-numbingly difficult problems, the likes of which I did not see in either OG or GMAT Prep), but am hopeful verbal tends to be as difficult as GMAT-test problems :)
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by DanaJ » Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:51 am
I've only taken two tests, but have seen countless problems posted in the quant forum and I agree with you that their quant is harder than the actual one. That's a good thing though, since it means that if you can train using the hard stuff, the easy stuff will be a breeze.

Can't say anything particular for their verbal, though. My verbal scores in MGMAT were sort of in line with GMATprep results, maybe a bit lower.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:04 am
I also took MGMAT test today and scored 45 in Quantitative. However, scored very less in verbal :( .
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by cbenk121 » Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:57 pm
viju9162 wrote:I also took MGMAT test today and scored 45 in Quantitative. However, scored very less in verbal :( .
Congrats! That problably means you're in range of 47 - 49 on GMAT Prep for quant. However, if you're shooting for 750, your verbal can't be a liability. Where are your weak verbal areas?

DanaJ: That's what I was thinking as well; it's a little last minute for me though. To people just beginning their GMAT journeys, I'd suggest taking all 6 MGMAT practice exams, if even just for the difficult math prep.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:20 pm
Hi cbenk121,

Thanks for those words. It gives me more confidence. I face lot of difficulties in Critical reasoning and sometimes in R C and S C.

The following is the breakdown of marks taken in the last test( MGMAT):

SC
Total: 15 questions
Right: 9
Wrong: 6
% Right: 60 %


C R
Total: 14 questions
Right: 6
Wrong: 8
% Right: 43 %

R C
Total: 12 questions
Right: 6
Wrong: 6
% Right: 50 %


I would request guidance as how to improve in verbal topic. I am thoroughly studying Manhattan S C and doing problems from OG. However, I need to drastically improve in verbal score.

Thank you,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by cbenk121 » Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:08 pm
OUCH!! CR is killing you. Get PowerScore's CR Bible, stat! That book helped me boost my CR hit rate from 75% on my diagnostic to 100% on my final practice exam.

For more ideas, check out my GMAT debrief. I talk about how I prepared for each section, and what I would've done differently if I had to take it again.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/i-beat-down- ... 48477.html
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:32 pm
Hi cbenk121 ,

Thank you very much. I will buy Powerscore CR Bible and will improvise on CR topic.

Regards,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by Giorgio » Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:12 am
You are right about the Quant section , I have just taken MGMAT 2nd test, and Quant killed me , I was screaming WooW all the time, cause it was the first time that I had to guess blind 3-4 questions , the problems were really time consuming , and I have scored 47Q...

I would not say that the verbal in MGMAT is easier than in Gmat prep , I had almost the same score V30 against my V31 in Gmat prep1.
Join the discussion