Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

MGMAT CAT3 CR Doubts

Expert replies
by samyak » Sun May 16, 2010 5:07 am
The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

A. Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.
B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.
D. The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.
E. The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.

IMO B is the right answer. OA says C. Please help me understand why B is wrong.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by this_time_i_will » Sun May 16, 2010 6:11 am
The best answer would be to show that there is other reason for low employment rate and C does precisely that.
Join the discussion

by samyak » Sun May 16, 2010 7:53 am
My inference:
B says some industries already had capital reserves.So lack of capital reserve is not the reason of recent decline in the employment rate & hence increase in the capital reserve can't stop the decline in employment.

Is it because "some" is mentioned in the option that we are neglecting this reasoning? I thought some can mean all as well.
Join the discussion

by bupbebeo » Sun May 16, 2010 8:11 am
samyak wrote:My inference:
B says some industries already had capital reserves.So lack of capital reserve is not the reason of recent decline in the employment rate & hence increase in the capital reserve can't stop the decline in employment.

Is it because "some" is mentioned in the option that we are neglecting this reasoning? I thought some can mean all as well.
An appreciable capital reserve does not mean not lacking it. therefore, B is wrong.
Join the discussion