BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mexicans'

Expert replies
by Ozlemg » Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:37 am
In 1985 state border colleges in Texas lost the enrollment of more than half, on average, of
the Mexican nationals they had previously served each year. Teaching faculties have alleged
that this extreme drop resulted from a rise in tuition for international and out-of-state students
from $ 40 to $ 120 per credit hour.
Which of the following, if feasible, offers the best prospects for alleviating the problem of the
drop in enrollment of Mexican nationals as the teaching faculties assessed it?

A. Providing grants-in-aid to Mexican nationals to study in Mexican universities.

B. Allowing Mexican nationals to study in Texas border colleges and to pay in-state tuitionrates, which are the same as the previous international rate

C. Reemphasizing the goals and mission of the Texas state border colleges as serving bothin-state students and Mexican nationals

D. Increasing the financial resources of Texas colleges by raising the tuition for in-statestudents attending state institutions

E. Offering career counseling for those Mexican nationals who graduate from state bordercolleges and intend to return to Mexico

I spend 5 mins. to figure out the correct answer.
How many minutes do you spend to answer it correctly? Could you tell pls?
OA : B
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GmatKiss » Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:06 am
IMO: B; 1:45 mins
Join the discussion

by sss2534 » Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:10 am
This seems like an extremely straight forward question -- too simple even by GMAT standards. 4 out of the 5 choices are off base -- and the correct response is logical and direct.

Now that said -- I can think of one reason (not the most convincing one) why this question might be confusing to some. If a person had no idea of Texas or Mexico (it helps to have some context), or more importantly what a border town or border college is -- then this might give them some trouble.
Join the discussion

by BlindVision » Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:42 pm
Ozlemg wrote:In 1985 state border colleges in Texas lost the enrollment of more than half, on average, of
the Mexican nationals they had previously served each year. Teaching faculties have alleged
that this extreme drop resulted from a rise in tuition for international and out-of-state students
from $ 40 to $ 120 per credit hour.
Which of the following, if feasible, offers the best prospects for alleviating the problem of the
drop in enrollment of Mexican nationals as the teaching faculties assessed it?

A. Providing grants-in-aid to Mexican nationals to study in Mexican universities.

B. Allowing Mexican nationals to study in Texas border colleges and to pay in-state tuitionrates, which are the same as the previous international rate

C. Reemphasizing the goals and mission of the Texas state border colleges as serving bothin-state students and Mexican nationals

D. Increasing the financial resources of Texas colleges by raising the tuition for in-statestudents attending state institutions

E. Offering career counseling for those Mexican nationals who graduate from state bordercolleges and intend to return to Mexico

I spend 5 mins. to figure out the correct answer.
How many minutes do you spend to answer it correctly? Could you tell pls?
OA : B
B 1:40
Life is a Test
Join the discussion