BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Meteorites

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:26 am
Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have been found all around the globe, but they have been found in the greatest density in geologically stable regions. This relatively greater abundance of securely identified crater in geologically stable regions must be explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions.

The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) A meteorite that strikes exactly the same spot as an earlier meteorite will obliterate all traces of the earlier impact.
(B) Rates of destructive geophysical processes within any given region vary markedly throughout geological time.
(C) The rate at which the Earth is struck by meteorites has greatly increased in geologically recent times.
(D) Actual meteorite impacts have been scattered fairly evenly over the Earth's surface in the course of Earth's geological history.
(E) The Earth's geologically stable regions have been studied more intensively by geologists than have its less stable regions.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by hrishi19884 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:09 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have been found all around the globe, but they have been found in the greatest density in geologically stable regions. This relatively greater abundance of securely identified crater in geologically stable regions must be explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions.

The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) A meteorite that strikes exactly the same spot as an earlier meteorite will obliterate all traces of the earlier impact.
(B) Rates of destructive geophysical processes within any given region vary markedly throughout geological time.
(C) The rate at which the Earth is struck by meteorites has greatly increased in geologically recent times.
(D) Actual meteorite impacts have been scattered fairly evenly over the Earth's surface in the course of Earth's geological history.
(E) The Earth's geologically stable regions have been studied more intensively by geologists than have its less stable regions.
My stake on D


The simple reason being - if meteorite strike evenly over earth's surface, there will be no denser and scarce regions

But since it is given that they are found more in stable regions, there must be some cause to it. The cause is "destructive geophysical processes in those regions".

All the other options didn't seem to be concerned with the point of reasoning.
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by TJ_Believes_Yes_U_Can » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:17 pm
Why not E ; E supports the premise also D restates the premise
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm
TJ_Believes_Yes_U_Can wrote:Why not E ; E supports the premise also D restates the premise
We are not discussing what geologists have studied in this question.

Also, if geologists study stable regions more - that does not weaken the possibility that meteorites may fall more in some regions and less in some regions and weaken the conclusion.

The only thing that would strengthen conclusion if we prove that they fall fairly evenly in all region. That's what I think.

I may be wrong... It's just my IMO :mrgreen:
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:41 pm
hrishi19884 wrote:
TJ_Believes_Yes_U_Can wrote:Why not E ; E supports the premise also D restates the premise
We are not discussing what geologists have studied in this question.

Also, if geologists study stable regions more - that does not weaken the possibility that meteorites may fall more in some regions and less in some regions and weaken the conclusion.

The only thing that would strengthen conclusion if we prove that they fall fairly evenly in all region. That's what I think.

I may be wrong... It's just my IMO :mrgreen:
Be confident Hrishi.. U r correct..

OA :D
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:08 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:
hrishi19884 wrote:
TJ_Believes_Yes_U_Can wrote:Why not E ; E supports the premise also D restates the premise
We are not discussing what geologists have studied in this question.

Also, if geologists study stable regions more - that does not weaken the possibility that meteorites may fall more in some regions and less in some regions and weaken the conclusion.

The only thing that would strengthen conclusion if we prove that they fall fairly evenly in all region. That's what I think.

I may be wrong... It's just my IMO :mrgreen:
Be confident Hrishi.. U r correct..

OA :D
thanks brother....I will be next time :oops:
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:57 pm
I believe the answer should be E
Join the discussion