Meteorites

gmatmachoman wrote:Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have been found all around the globe, but they have been found in the greatest density in geologically stable regions. This relatively greater abundance of securely identified crater in geologically stable regions must be explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions.

The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) A meteorite that strikes exactly the same spot as an earlier meteorite will obliterate all traces of the earlier impact.
(B) Rates of destructive geophysical processes within any given region vary markedly throughout geological time.
(C) The rate at which the Earth is struck by meteorites has greatly increased in geologically recent times.
(D) Actual meteorite impacts have been scattered fairly evenly over the Earth’s surface in the course of Earth’s geological history.
(E) The Earth’s geologically stable regions have been studied more intensively by geologists than have its less stable regions.

TJ_Believes_Yes_U_Can wrote:Why not E ; E supports the premise also D restates the premise

hrishi19884 wrote:

TJ_Believes_Yes_U_Can wrote:Why not E ; E supports the premise also D restates the premise

We are not discussing what geologists have studied in this question.

Also, if geologists study stable regions more - that does not weaken the possibility that meteorites may fall more in some regions and less in some regions and weaken the conclusion.

The only thing that would strengthen conclusion if we prove that they fall fairly evenly in all region. That's what I think.

I may be wrong... It's just my IMO :mrgreen:

gmatmachoman wrote:

hrishi19884 wrote:

TJ_Believes_Yes_U_Can wrote:Why not E ; E supports the premise also D restates the premise

We are not discussing what geologists have studied in this question.

Also, if geologists study stable regions more - that does not weaken the possibility that meteorites may fall more in some regions and less in some regions and weaken the conclusion.

The only thing that would strengthen conclusion if we prove that they fall fairly evenly in all region. That's what I think.

I may be wrong... It's just my IMO :mrgreen:

Be confident Hrishi.. U r correct..

OA :D