BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Metals

Expert replies
by vidhya16 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:43 pm
Metals, pigments and other chemical substances used by ancient cultures were not always benign, as the use of toxic lead by ancient Romans in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and their private homes demonstrate.

(A)the use of toxic lead by ancient Romans in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and their private homes demonstrate
(B)demonstrated by the use of toxic lead in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-both of their aqueducts and their private homes by ancient Romans
(C)demonstrated by the toxic lead that ancient Romans used in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and their private homes
(D)toxic lead used by ancient Romans in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-both of their aqueducts and of their private homes demonstrate
(E)the use by ancient Romans of toxic lead in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and private homes demonstrates

Ta
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by clock60 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:04 pm
vote for C

neither A nor D because of demonsrate, we need demonstrates or demonstrated
in B both of is not || with and ( no preposition before and)
in E both their and... no pronoun before and
Join the discussion

by vidhya16 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:23 pm
Clock,

Can you explain bit more how you arrived at your choice?

Ta
Join the discussion

by rob338 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:57 pm
imo d
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:31 pm
well, but i am bad expounder
A)the use of toxic lead and.......demonstrate, here is wrong usage of verb demonstrate
we need demonstrates, or at least demonstrated
D) the same problem with worling verb
toxic lead.....demonstrate-wrong verb
B)both of their aqueducts and their private homes by ancient Romans
i believe that we need preposition-of- before and in the second part of the idiom
both of their...and of their.
i am not too sure. as i saw ||-forms where they omit preposition. and still consider that correct
but in other options they follow strict ||-ism
E)again the problem with idiom both...and in that two parts are not ||
both their aqueducts and private homes demonstrates
in e they omit second their,before and it is not criminal but again in other versions they follow strict ||-ism
so left with C
in C they avoid usage of preposition of inserting it before both, and put their in both part of the idiom
of both their aqueducts and their private homes
By the way what is oa,
perhaps, i am proving that wrong answer is correct
Join the discussion

by nileshdalvi » Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:43 pm
Metals, pigments and other chemical substances used by ancient cultures were not always benign, as the use of toxic lead by ancient Romans in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and their private homes demonstrate.

(A)the use of toxic lead by ancient Romans in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and their private homes demonstrate
(B)demonstrated by the use of toxic lead in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-both of their aqueducts and their private homes by ancient Romans
(C)demonstrated by the toxic lead that ancient Romans used in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and their private homes
(D)toxic lead used by ancient Romans in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-both of their aqueducts and of their private homes demonstrate
(E)the use by ancient Romans of toxic lead in the plumbing-a word derived from the Latin word for "lead"-of both their aqueducts and private homes demonstrates


Whenever you find the answer options wherein the prepositional phrases are interchanged with one another then you must focus on:
1. whether the meaning of the original sentence or the intended logical meaning is distorted.
2. whether interchanging of the phrases leads to awkward sentence construction or no meaning at all.

Also do not forget to check whether other grammar rules are violated.


A - clearly a subject-verb agreement problem. The subject in the dependent clause followed by as "the use of toxic lead" does not agree with "demonstrate". Also, use of passive voice. "It is demonstrated by the use of toxic lead by Romans" would have been better than "Toxic leads use is demonstrated by Romans". However, if you find even a single grammatical flaw, dont bother to look for another.

B - Awkward Sentence Construction. Active Voice makes it look better though. One more thing, if you find something common amongst the answer choice, dont bother to look at it, for example, the origin of the word plumbing. So if that is removed, the answer choice looks something like this
"demonstrated by the use of toxic lead in the plumbing both of their aqueducts and their private homes by ancient Romans". "In the plumbing both of" does not make sense. Also, placing the modifier "by ancient Romans" at the end of the dependent clause does not make sense. It should be as close to "the use of toxic lead" as possible for it to match with the independent clause mentioned earlier "metals... used by ancient cultures. Also, this would make the pronoun "their"
to relate better.

C - No grammatical flaw, Active Voice.

D - Combines all possible flaws mentioned above: Subject Verb Disagreement, Awkward Sentence Construction. Unnecessary use of "of".

E - Awkward Positioning of the Prepositional Phrases/Modifiers. "The use..by Romans..of Toxic Lead ... in Plumbing ...of aqueducts and ...demonstrates. Does the "use by Romans demonstrates" that the "use of metals was benign"? No, the use of toxic lead indicates that. To match with the previous dependent clause, the use should be associated with toxic lead. Subject Verb Disagreement is corrected here but the subject itself does not make sense.

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1