BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Medieval Manuscript

Expert replies
by cata1yst » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:21 pm
Found this on the another forum...

A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies by the Greek playwright Euripides. Of these, ten called the “select plays,” are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries and also appear in other medieval manuscripts; this group includes some of Euripides’ best-known works, including the Medea. The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order, without commentary. The Electra is one of the alphabeticals.

Which of the following can be reliably concluded on the basis of the Statements given?

A. Only Euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient
commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts.

B. The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries
because they were the best known of Euripides’ works.

C. No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in
ancient times.

D. Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts
unaccompanied by ancient commentary.

E. Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary
in any extant medieval manuscript.

[spoiler]I thought the answer was B. There was a debate between B and E. I don't see how you E can be right though. You can't assume that Electra does not appear in another commentary (hence the word ANY used in E).[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ambarish_ranade » Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:14 pm
what's wrong with c
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:53 am
well this is why i selected E

while reading go on linking each sentence with the previous one....

out of 18, 10 were select plays,which had ancient commentaries and also used in other medieval manuscripts. Medea was one of them.

The OTHER 8 ( this implies that these 8 dnt have commentaries and dnt appear in any medieval manuscripts ) are placed in alphabetical order. Electra is one of them.

This is exactly what E says....
Join the discussion

by cata1yst » Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:17 am
ambarish_ranade wrote:what's wrong with c
We can't assume anything. Maybe a commentary was written on Electra in some book called Amazing Commentaries.
Join the discussion

by cata1yst » Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:20 am
PAB2706 wrote:well this is why i selected E

while reading go on linking each sentence with the previous one....

out of 18, 10 were select plays,which had ancient commentaries and also used in other medieval manuscripts. Medea was one of them.

The OTHER 8 ( this implies that these 8 dnt have commentaries and dnt appear in any medieval manuscripts ) are placed in alphabetical order. Electra is one of them.

This is exactly what E says....

You are right about there being no commentaries on Electra in L. But the statement provided in answer choice E says "any extant medieval manuscript". There could be hundreds of others of extant medieval manuscripts that contain a commentary on Elecrtra. We don't know this though.
Join the discussion

Re: Medieval Manuscript

by [email protected] » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:08 pm
I am not convinced with B because from no where in the Stimulus it can be concluded that "The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries because they were the best known of Euripides’ works."

Since all other choices also seem to be wrong so I would choose B just because all other choices are wrong..


cata1yst wrote:Found this on the another forum...

A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies by the Greek playwright Euripides. Of these, ten called the “select plays,” are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries and also appear in other medieval manuscripts; this group includes some of Euripides’ best-known works, including the Medea. The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order, without commentary. The Electra is one of the alphabeticals.

Which of the following can be reliably concluded on the basis of the Statements given?

A. Only Euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient
commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts.

B. The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries
because they were the best known of Euripides’ works.

C. No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in
ancient times.

D. Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts
unaccompanied by ancient commentary.

E. Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary
in any extant medieval manuscript.

[spoiler]I thought the answer was B. There was a debate between B and E. I don't see how you E can be right though. You can't assume that Electra does not appear in another commentary (hence the word ANY used in E).[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Sun Dec 13, 2009 3:02 am
cata1yst wrote:Found this on the another forum...

A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies by the Greek playwright Euripides. Of these, ten called the ?select plays,? are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries and also appear in other medieval manuscripts; this group includes some of Euripides? best-known works, including the Medea. The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order, without commentary. The Electra is one of the alphabeticals.

Which of the following can be reliably concluded on the basis of the Statements given?

A. Only Euripides? best-known works are accompanied by ancient
commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts.

B. The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries
because they were the best known of Euripides? works.

C. No commentaries were written about Euripides? Electra in
ancient times.

D. Euripides? Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts
unaccompanied by ancient commentary.

E. Euripides? Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary
in any extant medieval manuscript.

[spoiler]I thought the answer was B. There was a debate between B and E. I don't see how you E can be right though. You can't assume that Electra does not appear in another commentary (hence the word ANY used in E).[/spoiler]
Is the OA correct ??
Join the discussion

by witty1 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:26 am
What does "this group" refer to?
Join the discussion

by mankey » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:07 am
Request some expert to help on this one.

Regards.
Join the discussion

by chris@magoosh » Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:41 pm
I like this question :)

Does anybody know the source? It feels GMAT-y to me in terms of content and the way the answer choices are worded.

Anyhow, let me hopefully clear things up a little.

We know that:

the "select plays" in 'L' are accompanied by commentaries
the "select plays" are ALSO found in other manuscripts.
the "select plays" contain SOME of Euripides' best known plays.
Medea is a "select play."


Now for the "other eight," which are in contrast to the "select plays."

We know the "other eight" do not include commentary.
We know the "other eight" appear in alphabetical order. (Suggesting that the "select plays" are not in alphabetical order).
Electra is an "alphabetical." -------> Electra does not include commentary

Now there is one little step. Notice how the "select plays" differ from "the alphabeticals" in that they are ALSO found in other medieval manuscripts. Therefore the "other eight" are not found in medieval manuscripts ------> Electra does not appear in other ancient manuscripts. The only manuscript it does appear in it is not accompanied by commentary. Thus (E).

For (D), we know Medea appears in other medieval manuscripts. We do not know whether these manuscripts have commentary.

For (B), we do not know for certain why the "select plays" had commentaries. Commonsense tells us that it was probably because they were Euripides' best known work. However, based on the argument, we cannot logically conclude that.

Hope that was helpful :).
Join the discussion

by percy.arora » Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:20 am
I would like to point out that this is a gmat prep exam pack 1 question. And as it is the question posted above lacks a certain but really important part of information i.e the statements in the official question explicitly state that the other 8 plays are found ONLY in L. Pretty important I suppose but the same info is omitted in the stimulus posted above.
Join the discussion