Hi All,
Is McGraw-Hill's GMAT, 2010 Edition any good? Does it represent true GMAT style questions?
I have done 2 tests this week from the book and got 690 and 660 respectively, while in GMATPrep tests I got 500 and 540, and Kaplan 540. These attempts done last week. I am shocked with the sudden jump in score in just couple of days. Hence, advise on this book will be helpful as I will be doing my actual test on the 24th Mar.
Also, the way I calculate my GMAT score from the book is as follows:
Q: I scale them proportionally to 60 and then multiple by 9
V: I scale the, proportionally to 60 and then multiple by 7
Add both this score less 15. I am sure its not accurate but does give a rough estimate.
eg: My first test from the McGraw-Hill's GMAT, 2010 Edition book, Q(+30,-7) and V(+26,-15)
Q: (30/37)*60*9 = 438
V: (26/41)*60*7 = 266
Total: 705 - 15 = 690
Your feedback on this will be appreciated
Regards
Is McGraw-Hill's GMAT, 2010 Edition any good? Does it represent true GMAT style questions?
I have done 2 tests this week from the book and got 690 and 660 respectively, while in GMATPrep tests I got 500 and 540, and Kaplan 540. These attempts done last week. I am shocked with the sudden jump in score in just couple of days. Hence, advise on this book will be helpful as I will be doing my actual test on the 24th Mar.
Also, the way I calculate my GMAT score from the book is as follows:
Q: I scale them proportionally to 60 and then multiple by 9
V: I scale the, proportionally to 60 and then multiple by 7
Add both this score less 15. I am sure its not accurate but does give a rough estimate.
eg: My first test from the McGraw-Hill's GMAT, 2010 Edition book, Q(+30,-7) and V(+26,-15)
Q: (30/37)*60*9 = 438
V: (26/41)*60*7 = 266
Total: 705 - 15 = 690
Your feedback on this will be appreciated
Regards
