Mayor: The recycling program costs us nearly $1 million to

Expert replies

Previous Topic Next Topic

BTGmoderatorDC: Moderator; Posts: 7187; Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pmFollowed by: 23 members

by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Jul 04, 2019 8:11 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

Stats

Difficulty—

Mayor: The recycling program costs us nearly $1 million to operate every year, and our budget shortfall this year is projected to be $5 million. We need to cut the recycling program in order to help balance the budget.

Consumer Advocate: It costs the city more to throw something out than to recycle it.

The consumer advocate responds to the mayor by

(A) establishing that the mayor's figures were incorrectly calculated
(B) accepting the mayor's conclusion but questioning the legality of the plan
(C) interpreting the mayor's evidence in a way that reduces the validity of the mayor's claim
(D) introducing a new piece of information that calls into question the validity of the mayor's conclusion
(E) pointing out that the mayor has not adequately considered the potential causes and effects of the budget shortfall

OA D

Source: Manhattan Prep

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Thu Jul 04, 2019 8:11 pm

deloitte247: Legendary Member; Posts: 2214; Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Thu Jul 11, 2019 3:55 pm

We need to find the technique that the consumer advocate used in responding to the Mayor.
Premise:
- recycling program costs nearly $1 million.
- that year's budget has been cut by $5 million.

Explanation: The mayor believes that cutting out the recycling program will help to balance the budget, but the consumer advocate gave a logical explanation to why the recycling program shouldn't be cut off.

Option A - Incorrect
The consumer advocate didn't respond by using any figures at all.

Option B - Incorrect
Well, there is no indication through the advocate's response to show that the mayor's conclusion was accepted; neither was its legality questioned.

Option C - Incorrect
This reduces the validity of the mayor's claims, but the response is not an interpretation of the claim.

Option D - Correct
The consumer advocate provided a new piece of information that gives a different perspective to the mayors claim.
It gives an alternative view and calls to question the validity of the mayors' claim.

Option E - Incorrect
The advocate's response is not about the potential causes and effect of the budget shortfall, but about the recycling program in particular.

GMAT Course Reviews

563 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (563 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review