BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MAYOR

Expert replies
by sogmat » Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:13 pm
The mayor boasts that the average ambulance turnaround time, the time from summons to delivery of the patient, has been reduced this year for top-priority emergencies. This is a serious misrepresentation. This “reduction” was produced simply by redefining “top priority.” Such emergencies used to include gunshot wounds and electrocutions, the most time-consuming cases. Now they are limited strictly to heart attacks and strokes.
Which one of the following would strengthen the author’s conclusion that it was the redefinition of “top priority” that produced the reduction in turnaround time?
(A) The number of heart attacks and strokes declined this year.
(B) The mayor redefined the city’s financial priorities this year.
(C) Experts disagree with the mayor’s definition of “top-priority emergency.”
(D) Other cities include gunshot wound cases in their category o top-priority emergencies
(E) One half of all of last year’s top-priority emergencies were gunshot wounds and electrocution cases
oa e
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: MAYOR

by rahulg83 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:25 pm
sogmat wrote:The mayor boasts that the average ambulance turnaround time, the time from summons to delivery of the patient, has been reduced this year for top-priority emergencies. This is a serious misrepresentation. This “reduction” was produced simply by redefining “top priority.” Such emergencies used to include gunshot wounds and electrocutions, the most time-consuming cases. Now they are limited strictly to heart attacks and strokes.
Which one of the following would strengthen the author’s conclusion that it was the redefinition of “top priority” that produced the reduction in turnaround time?
(A) The number of heart attacks and strokes declined this year.
(B) The mayor redefined the city’s financial priorities this year.
(C) Experts disagree with the mayor’s definition of “top-priority emergency.”
(D) Other cities include gunshot wound cases in their category o top-priority emergencies
(E) One half of all of last year’s top-priority emergencies were gunshot wounds and electrocution cases
oa e
C -> 'Top priority' cases include only heart-attacks and strokes
P -> turnaround time for 'top prority cases' has been reduced. This is true.

I guess A should be the answer because it is strengthning the conclusion be saying that no of top priority cases declined this year so average TAT has also declined.
Any other explanation please. Maybe i am wrong in this reasoning somewhere.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:34 pm
It would be E

Why?

Its given that gunshot wounds and electrocutions are the most time-consuming cases and it represents half of the cases last year.

This year if u take half of your most time consuming cases and calcuate the effeciency then it will definitely lead to misleading results or biased results or hyped up numbers.

This streghthens the argument that redefinition was the reason.

Basically it strengthens the argument by showing data based on which the conclusion is made is accurate / trustworthy

Hope this helps!

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:09 pm
I like both A and E, not sure which one is better as they both strengthen the conclusion.
Join the discussion

Conclusion is reduction of turn around time

Premise is top priority accidents are gun shot wounds and electrocutions

A is not wrong but

Does not strengthen the premise or argument

B is irrelevant

C is out of scope, there are no experts in the arg

D other cities are not in scope

E is correct - it strengthens the premise and the mayor's argument to redefine this years top-priorities
Regards,
Arvind
Join the discussion

by samanthaJ79 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:55 am
I think A should be the answer
Join the discussion