BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Math SET-1, Q18(value of Integer K)

Expert replies
by iikarthik » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:09 am
Q18:
What is the value of the integer k?
(1) k + 3 > 0
(2) k^4 <= 0

Hi,

Would be of great assistance if someone can solve and explain this problem for me.

Apologies,

Have edited the post .... k^4 <= 0
The OA is B
Thanks
karthik
Last edited by iikarthik on Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kvcpk » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:49 am
What is the value of the integer k?
(1) k + 3 > 0

k>-3

Now let us say k=0
Is 0>-3 . It is.
What is the answer for the problem now? 0 [because, we want value of k].

Now let us say k=1
Is 1>-3? Yes.

What is the answer in this case? K=1.

If we get 2 different results for the given question, then the statement provided is INSUFFICIENT.
Hence INSUFF

(2) k^4 < 0

k^4<0

Given k is an integer. I believe k^4 can never be less than 0.

I would suggest you to check your source.
Join the discussion

by aloneontheedge » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:52 am
iikarthik wrote:Q18:
What is the value of the integer k?
(1) k + 3 > 0
(2) k^4 < 0

Hi,

Would be of great assistance if someone can solve and explain this problem for me.

The OA is B
Thanks
karthik
Please chk the source,as kvpck mentioned it cannot be < 0
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:14 am
kvcpk wrote:What is the value of the integer k?
(1) k + 3 > 0

k>-3

Now let us say k=0
Is 0>-3 . It is.
What is the answer for the problem now? 0 [because, we want value of k].

Now let us say k=1
Is 1>-3? Yes.

What is the answer in this case? K=1.

If we get 2 different results for the given question, then the statement provided is INSUFFICIENT.
Hence INSUFF

(2) k^4 < 0

k^4<0

Given k is an integer. I believe k^4 can never be less than 0.

I would suggest you to check your source.
The second statement says that k^4<= 0. So k^4 does not have to be greater than zero.
it can simply be 0. So, K^4 = 0. So, when it is possible to have this. When k = 0.
So, the value of K is zero and the option B is the answer..
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:16 am
It seems that original poster later corrected the problem...dats y kvcpk got wrong..
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:25 pm
adi_800 wrote:It seems that original poster later corrected the problem...dats y kvcpk got wrong..
Thanks Adi..
Original post had wrong details. So stopped it in mid.
Join the discussion

by iikarthik » Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:39 am
Hi all,

Apologies,

It was my mistake..

& i had edited the post.

Thanks,
karthik
Join the discussion