Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Math problem: is there something wrong?

Expert replies
by akacharlie » Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:03 pm
Hi,
maybe somebody can help me with that one, that was given to me at a gmat prep course. My guess is that none of the answers are correct, maybe I am wrong but at least I'd like to know why:

In a sports league, ten team are divided into two divisions, with five teams playing in each division. If each team much play each other team in its own division exactly three times, and each team not in its division exactly once, how many games will be scheduled for the entire league?

A) 40
B) 55
C) 80
D) 145
E) 265

I personnaly found 85, as well as some other student of the course. One student found 145 (D) but I think some of the games were counted twice.

This is how I have proceeded:

1) count the number of games within one division:

let say that we have teams

A : plays 3 games vs each of B, C, D, E = 12
B : plays 3 games vs each of C, D, E since 3games vs A has already been counted = 9
C : plays 3 games vs D and E (games vs A and B have been counted) = 6
D : plays 3 games vs E = 3
E : has already played 3 games against each other team

total for one division = 12 + 9 + 6 + 3 = 30

=> total for 2 division in terms of intra games = 30 x 2 = 60

2) now lets count inter division games :
each team plays each other exactly once

A plays 5 game as wel as B, C, D, E = 25
We don't need to x2 because the other teams games are counted in those games

Tot = 60 + 25 = 85

Thanks for your help guys
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: Math problem: is there something wrong?

by gabriel » Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:42 am
akacharlie wrote:...In a sports league, ten team are divided into two divisions, with five teams playing in each division. If each team much play each other team in its own division exactly three times, and each team not in its division exactly once, how many games will be scheduled for the entire league?

A) 40
B) 55
C) 80
D) 145
E) 265

.. in a division the number of matches played is 5c2*3 = 30 ... so the number of matches played within the respective divisions is 30*2 = 60 ..

the number of matches played between the 2 divisions is 5*5 = 25 .. so total number of matches is 60+25 = 85 ...

.. hmmm .. 85 seems right to me too ..
Join the discussion