BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Marbles in bags

Expert replies
by nish9622 » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:35 pm
A box contains bags of marbles. All of the bags hold the same number of marbles except one bag, which holds one marble more than each of the other bags hold. If the box contains a total of 2001 marbles, how many bags are in the box?

(1) The number of bags is between 13 and 23 inclusive

(2) There is an even number of bags, and there is an even number of marbles in the bag containing the extra marble.

I understand how to solve the Q. I want to know of faster ways to think of the examples that will satisfy these conditions, especially for Statement 2- since its so open ended.

OA is C
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:58 pm
nish9622 wrote:A box contains bags of marbles. All of the bags hold the same number of marbles except one bag, which holds one marble more than each of the other bags hold. If the box contains a total of 2001 marbles, how many bags are in the box?

(1) The number of bags is between 13 and 23 inclusive

(2) There is an even number of bags, and there is an even number of marbles in the bag containing the extra marble.

I understand how to solve the Q. I want to know of faster ways to think of the examples that will satisfy these conditions, especially for Statement 2- since its so open ended.

OA is C
Given: Say, there are m bags and n marbles in each except one bag has one more marble than n.
Thus, total number of marbles = (mn + 1) = 2001 => mn = 2000
Therefore, m and n are factors of 2000.

Statement 1: 13 ≤ m ≤ 23
The factors of 2000 between 13 and 23 are 16 and 20. Thus m can be 16 or 20!

Not sufficient.

Statement 2: m is even and (n + 1) is even => n is odd.
Thus, we have to look for an even and an odd factor of 2000 such that their product is 2000. Now, 2000 = 5*400 = 16*125 = 25*80 etc..

The set (m, n) can be (16, 125) or (80, 25) etc...

Not sufficient.

1 & 2 Together: m is an even factor of 2000 between 13 and 23. Only two possible values of m are 16 and 20. But for m = 20, n = 100, which is not possible as n has to be odd. For m = 16, n = 125 (odd!)

Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by nish9622 » Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:05 pm
Thanks, So the answer is basically that I have to prime factorize/factorize and get the pairs-- no other option :(
I was hoping for some miracle! :D
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:23 pm
nish9622 wrote:Thanks, So the answer is basically that I have to prime factorize/factorize and get the pairs-- no other option :(
I was hoping for some miracle! :D
You don't have to go for complete factorization of 2000.
A partial factorization is needed only for the analysis of statement 2. Once you've found two such set, it is sufficient to conclude that statement 2 is insufficient.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion