BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Many art historians use Roman copies of Greek statues in ord

Expert replies
by Anaira Mitch » Fri Mar 09, 2018 8:38 pm
Many art historians use Roman copies of Greek statues in order to learn more about Greek sculpture. A problem with this strategy is that statues were often adapted from Greek prototypes to suit the taste of Roman patrons. Indeed, these statues often have distinctive features that are not specific to Greek style.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the art historians' strategy?
A. All Roman copies of Greek statues share a number of important characteristics that are absent from original Roman sculpture.
B. Most ancient statues were melted down for reusable metal.
C. All art historians focus on one particular region or nationality in their studies.
D. Many art historians who study Roman art do not make conclusions about Greek art on the basis of their observations.
E. even those Roman statues that are not based on Greek artwork are significantly different from other forms of ancient sculpture.

Source - ready4gmat
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Anaira Mitch » Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:30 am
Hello All,

Any one?
Join the discussion

by s_sandoval » Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:01 pm
Bumping for expert analysis. Thank you!
Join the discussion

Subject

by ErikaPrepScholar » Tue Mar 20, 2018 5:11 am
We want to WEAKEN a CRITICISM. First lets rephrase the criticism from the passage in our own words: "Looking at Roman copies of Greek statues to learn about Greek sculpture doesn't always work because the statues have updated features that aren't Greek." To weaken this criticism, we want to prove that looking at Roman copies of Greek statues is still a valuable way to learn about Greek sculpture - maybe there aren't many non-Greek updated features, or we can learn something about Greek sculpture from the updated features anyway?

A. All Roman copies of Greek statues share a number of important characteristics that are absent from original Roman sculpture.
If these copies have features that aren't present in the Roman style, these features must be in the Greek style. This means that even if some features are updated, we know that some are not and can learn from those. This works!

B. Most ancient statues were melted down for reusable metal.
This doesn't impact our argument - whether or not Greek and Roman statues are rare now, we still run into the issue that we can't trust Roman copies of Greek statues to be accurate. Eliminate.

C. All art historians focus on one particular region or nationality in their studies.
Like in B, whether or not the art historians are focused on more than just Greece doesn't impact whether or not they can learn about Greece from Roman statues. Even if the historians can learn something valuable about Rome from the Roman statues doesn't matter - we specifically want to know if they can learn about Greece. Eliminate.

D. Many art historians who study Roman art do not make conclusions about Greek art on the basis of their observations.
If anything, this strengthens the criticism - most art historians don't use Roman art to learn about Greek art, so why would we use Roman statues to learn about Greek statues? Eliminate.

E. even those Roman statues that are not based on Greek artwork are significantly different from other forms of ancient sculpture.
This may even strengthen the criticism - the Roman style is distinct from all other styles, so it is likely that they made many updates in their copies of Greek statues to make them fit in with their style. Eliminate.
Image

Erika John - Content Manager/Lead Instructor
https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/

Get tutoring from me or another PrepScholar GMAT expert: https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/tutoring/

Learn about our exclusive savings for BTG members (up to 25% off) and our 5 day free trial

Check out our PrepScholar GMAT YouTube channel, and read our expert guides on the PrepScholar GMAT blog
Join the discussion