IMOB Pls let me know OA and correct me if i am wrong.

Wide dissemination of wireless networks in cities is a practical way to meet the needs of city households, schools and businesses. Rural communities have found that wireless networks are both more reliable and cheaper than land-based networks. Which of the following would most likely be cited by a supporter of the argument? • Urban areas do not pose additional problems for the effective operation of wireless networks. • Wireless networks work far better where population density is low. • Iceland, a very rural country, successfully uses wireless networks. • The expenses of wireless transmission in areas with large buildings is much higher. • Poor neighborhoods have less access to cable internet than do educators or businesses. The premise is about the success of wireless networks in RURAL COMMUNITIES. The conclusion is about the dissemination of wireless networks in CITIES. The argument assumes that CITIES can be compared to RURAL COMMUNITIES and that nothing will prevent wireless networks from succeeding in cities. To strengthen the conclusion, the correct answer choice must show that wireless networks will be able to succeed in CITIES, just as they have succeeded in RURAL COMMUNITIES. A: Urban areas do not pose additional problems for the effective operation of wireless networks. This answer choice supports the assumption that nothing will prevent wireless networks from succeeding in cities. The correct answer is A.