BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan Inequality and Absolute problem

Expert replies
by Kaustubhk » Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:55 am
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0

The OA is C


Hi Mates,

My approach

Is |x| < 1?

We need to find -1<x<1, whether x falls in this range.

1) |x+1| = 2|x-1|

First i considered positive sign,

x+1 = 2x-2
x=3.. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

Now consider negative sign,

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)
-x-1 =-2x +2
x= 3 .. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

A is insufficient.

2) |x-3| >0

First consider positive sign,

x-3>0
x>3..This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

Now consider negative sign

-(X-3) >0
-X+3>0
-X>-3

X<3..This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,


If i go by my approach the answer would be E.

When i checked the solution,

The step where i take negative sign for 1st case, therein the opposite sign is used.

Opposite signs

(x+1) = -2(x-1)
x+1 =-2x +2
x= 1/3 .. This falls in the range -1<x<1,


I'm confused as to why opposite signs are taken..
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:32 am
Kaustubhk wrote:1) |x+1| = 2|x-1|

First i considered positive sign,

x+1 = 2x-2
x=3.. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

Now consider negative sign,

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)
-x-1 =-2x +2
x= 3 .. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,
If both sides of the blue equation are multiplied by -1, the result is the red equation.
Since each side of the blue equation is multiplied by the SAME VALUE, the resulting equation -- the equation in red -- is the SAME as the original equation.
Since both equations are essentially the same, the red equation will yield the same solution as the blue equation.

When both sides of an equation have absolute value, solve two cases:
1. The equation with signs unchanged
2. The equation with signs changed on ONLY ONE SIDE.

Check my post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/inequality-t88623.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:53 am
Kaustubhk wrote:Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0

The OA is C


Hi Mates,

My approach

Is |x| < 1?

We need to find -1<x<1, whether x falls in this range.

1) |x+1| = 2|x-1|

First i considered positive sign,

x+1 = 2x-2
x=3.. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

Now consider negative sign,

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)
-x-1 =-2x +2
x= 3 .. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,


A is insufficient.

2) |x-3| >0

First consider positive sign,

x-3>0
x>3..This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

Now consider negative sign

-(X-3) >0
-X+3>0
-X>-3

X<3..This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,


If i go by my approach the answer would be E.

When i checked the solution,

The step where i take negative sign for 1st case, therein the opposite sign is used.

Opposite signs

(x+1) = -2(x-1)
x+1 =-2x +2
x= 1/3 .. This falls in the range -1<x<1,


I'm confused as to why opposite signs are taken..
Hi Kaustubhk,

I think you need someone to teach the concepts of Data Sufficiency. Data Sufficiency questions test whether the information given in a statement/statements is sufficient or not.

Even if one is sure that the given information is sufficient to prove that we cannot reach a unique result, you are still in a position to answer the question.

In Statement 1, you twice write "This doesn't fall in the range." Since there is no contradiction, you can conclude or answer the question. (However, the red part is wrong!).

Secondly, you need to sharpen your fundamental about the concept of absolute numbers.

I correct the red part of your working.

Statement 1:

Now consider negative sign,

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)
-x-1 =-2x +2
x= 3 .. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,


IT SHOULD BE:

Now consider negative sign,

(x+1) = -2(x-1); Take negative sign only on one side!
x+1 =-2x +2
3x= 1
x = 1/3 .. This falls in the range -1<x<1,

Since there is a contradiction in results: a. DOES NOT FALL for case 1 and b. FALLS for case 2, there is no unique answer!

Regarding Statement 2, you did all fine except that you concluded incorrectly that x < 3 means that This doesn't falls in the range -1<x<1.

What if x = 1/2? x = 1/2 satisfies both x < 3 as well as -1<x<1. So Statement 2 is also a case of contradictory results.

Hope now you can deal with both the statements together.

Hope this helps!

Download free ebook: Manhattan Review GMAT Quantitative Question Bank Guide

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Bangkok | Abu Dhabi | Rome | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion