BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan GMAT SC Guide: Problem Set on Verb Tenses

Expert replies
by rahul810 » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:09 pm
1. we thought that joe didn't go to the museum with the rest of the class.

2. She had gotten up in the morning and was brushing her teeth when the phone rang

3. The attorney proposed that the session was adjourned until the following day

4. we could start the meeting if sam was here

(answer for the above one "we could start the meeting if sam were here " sam is singular were is plural ???

can some one give detail explanations for the above sentences. I want to know what makes them right or wrong.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Danielle » Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:24 pm
Rahul, it's a bit difficult to tell if these phrases/sentences are correct or not as there isn't much information, but here goes...

1. Correct -- I assume that the point of confusion here is "didn't go". The past tense of go is went, but the negative past tense of go is did not go.

2. Correct -- Again, I assume the confusion is with the verbs. "had gotten up" is appropriate to tell what happened in the past while telling a story, or narrating from the past tense. "Was brushing" is imperfect tense and is the proper way to describe something that happened in the past over an extended period of time.

3. Incorrect -- "was" is incorrect; "be" is correct. I think this is an idiom.

4. Incorrect -- "was" should be "were". Were is correct because it is correct in the subjunctive, which is what this verb tense is, not past tense.

It looks like you may need to review the verb tenses and participles of common irregular verbs like "to be" and "to go", since that seems to be the confusing part that all these sentences have in common. Good luck!
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:21 pm
Some clarification for 3:

The reason we use "be" in 3 is because the verb "proposed" also requires the subjunctive.

There are two cases in which we use the subjunctive tense.

(1) When we make statements contrary to reality. Your sentence 4 is an example of such a case. In this situation, the one part of the sentence generally uses "could" or "would" and the other part of the sentence uses "were".

e.g. If I were rich, then I would buy a gold bathtub.
I would go to Harvard if I were accepted.

(2) When we use verbs that are requests or demands (e.g. ask, order, mandate...). In this case, we follow the first verb with "that" and the next verb is in infinitive form minus "to".

e.g. I ask that you do your homework. (inf form: "to do")
House rules mandate that we be in bed before 10 p.m. (inf form: "to be")
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by .maxime. » Sun Mar 02, 2008 3:13 am
"Order x to be y" is also correct. Can I infer from this that if we leave 'that' from asking or demanding verbs, we can make the same construction?

I mandate x to be y
I ask x to be y
...

Plus, you say that the verb 'propose' requires a subjunctive, but only when 'that' is used, I assume?

The attorney proposed to adjourn the session ...
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1