Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Manhattan DS Problem

Expert replies
by Number7 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:14 am
Dear all,

I have one question concerning this example:

What is the value of y?

(1) 3|x² – 4| = y – 2
(2) |3 – y| = 11

I thought that statement No. 1 was sufficient. Why?

I altered the equation this way:

|x² - 4| = (y-2)/3. This can be rewritten in the following

I. x² - 4 = (y-2)/3 and
II. x² - 4 = (2-y)/3

Both equation taken together: x = 2 and x = -2. Both roots give me y = 0 if I combine them with the original equation.
I know that this is wrong. Can anyone explain to me why?

Can |x² - 4| = (y-2)/3 not be rewritten this way? Why not? I thought that this would always be possible if I deal with absolute values?!

E.g.: |x - 2| > 2 --> x-2 > 2 and x-2 < -2...


Thank you very much!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bha » Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:08 am
I don't think you can use eqns x² - 4 = (y-2)/3 x² - 4 = (2-y)/3 as two different eqn to solve for x and y as they are derived from same eqn...
Stmt 1 is not-sufficient as it have unknown value x

Stmt 2:
|3-y|= 11
can be written as A> 3-Y = 11...Y=-8
B> 3-Y=-11....Y = 14
from stmt2..Y=-8 or 14..NOT SUFFICIENT

combining 1 and 2 ...I don't think we can get one value for 'Y'..it will give four values for X...
hence IMO answer is 'E'
Join the discussion

by bha » Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:08 am
What is the OA?
Join the discussion

Hmm

by Number7 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:24 am
Thank you for your help. It makes sense that one cannot use the eqations to solve for x since they are derived from the same "basic" equation. However - I still do not understand WHY this is not possible. As I already mentioned it would be possible to get fix numbers for x which could be used to find y = 0. However, according to statement 2 other values must be correct.

OA is C! Statement 1: y is greater than or equal to 2; statement 2: y = -8 or 14. Only 14 is greater than or equal to 2. Therefore, y = 14. Both statements together are sufficient...
Join the discussion

Re: Manhattan DS Problem

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:27 pm
Number7 wrote:
I altered the equation this way:

|x² - 4| = (y-2)/3. This can be rewritten in the following

I. x² - 4 = (y-2)/3 and
II. x² - 4 = (2-y)/3

Both equation taken together: x = 2 and x = -2. Both roots give me y = 0 if I combine them with the original equation.
I know that this is wrong. Can anyone explain to me why?
The part I don't understand in your solution is when you conclude, from your equations, that x = 2 and x = - 2. This would be true if you knew that x^2 - 4 = 0, but that's clearly not going to be true for most values of y. The roots of x^2 - 4 are only solutions for x if you know that x^2 - 4 = 0.

In any case, you have a single equation from 1), with two unknowns, and you will not be able to find a unique solution for y.
Number7 wrote:What is the value of y?
(1) 3|x² – 4| = y – 2
(2) |3 – y| = 11
The first statement looks complicated, but we can deduce something quite simple from it. The absolute value of anything cannot be negative. From 1),

y = 3|x^2 - 4| + 2

The smallest possible value of |x^2 - 4| is zero. So y must be greater than or equal to 3*0 + 2 = 2. Combine that with the second statement (which gives two solutions on its own, -8 and 14) and you get a single value for y; y must be 14.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Number7 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:10 pm
Dear Ian,

just to explain my "special" way to get x = 2 und x = -2:

I added both equations that I get from statement 1:

I. x² - 4 = (y-2)/3
II. x² - 4 = (2-y)/3

I changed the first by multiplying it with -1

I. -3x² + 12 = - y + 2
II. 3x² - 12 = 2- y

Add both equations:

III. 0 = -2y + 4 . Therefore y = 2. And x² = 4 --> x = 2 and x=-2



:roll:

If you could tell me why I can't do this, I would be very pleased :)

In other tasks this was a possible way to get the correct solution. However, in these tasks I did not use two equations that based on just one equation like |...|
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:50 pm
Number7 wrote:Dear Ian,

just to explain my "special" way to get x = 2 und x = -2:

I added both equations that I get from statement 1:

I. x² - 4 = (y-2)/3
II. x² - 4 = (2-y)/3

I changed the first by multiplying it with -1

I. -3x² + 12 = - y + 2
II. 3x² - 12 = 2- y

Add both equations:

III. 0 = -2y + 4 . Therefore y = 2. And x² = 4 --> x = 2 and x=-2



:roll:

If you could tell me why I can't do this, I would be very pleased :)

In other tasks this was a possible way to get the correct solution. However, in these tasks I did not use two equations that based on just one equation like |...|
The reason why you can't add the equations together is actually quite simple - they're not joint equations, they're alternative equations.

When we solve for absolute value, we always have an "or" situation. In other words, when you end up with:

I. x² - 4 = (y-2)/3
II. x² - 4 = (2-y)/3

it's not the case that both I AND II are true, it's the case that EITHER I OR II is true.

Looking at a much simpler example:

|x| = 4

doesn't solve to:

x=4 AND x=-4, it solves to:

x=4 OR x=-4;

after all, there's no way that x could be both positive and negative 4 simultaneously.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by Number7 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:11 am
Dear Stuart,


of course! Stupid mistake. :)

Thank you very much!

Best regards!
Join the discussion