BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan : CR_Assumption

Expert replies
by joealam1 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:19 am
The Ergonomic Society conducted a study that indicated that many people develop severe back problems during adulthood, and that virtually all such people who received chiropractic treatment showed great improvement. Therefore, in order to minimize the proportion of the population that suffers from back pain, the Ergonomic Society recommended that chiropractic treatment be directed toward those adults who suffer from severe back problems.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Any person who receives chiropractic treatment for back pain may also benefit from other forms of treatment.
B) Large insurance carriers cover chiropractic care for back problems to a lesser degree than they do other medical treatments.
C) Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back problems are not less likely to develop back pain than those who do not.
D) Chiropractic treatment is more effective in treating severe back problems when utilized over a long period of time, as opposed to sporadically.
E) Severe back pain and other problems often cause individuals to miss workdays.

[spoiler]OA:C[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by joealam1 » Tue Nov 29, 2016 5:34 am
Prompt: many people-> severe back problems during adulthood ; All shows improvement after chiropractic treatment.

=> Conclusion: to minimize proportion of back pain -> chiropractic treatment for adults who suffer back pain.

A)Other form of treatment is irrelevant for this prompt (not an assumption that the argument depends on)
B) Whether large insurance cover or not (not relevant for our argument, not an assumption that the argument depends on)
C) Correct answer
D) Long vs sporadic period is not discussed in the prompt (not relevant)
E) missing workdays is not discussed in the prompt (not an assumption that the argument depends on)

it was easy to rule out answer A, B, D and E as they are all out of scope.

NEGATION of C: Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back are more likely to develop back pain than those who do not (this one weakens the conclusion, by showing that it is better to use the treatment as a preventive one rather than start curing people after they develop the problem)

So clearly the argument depends on the assumption that "Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back problems are not less likely to develop back pain than those who do not."
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:15 am
Hi joealam1.

First of all, this question is a little weak.

I guess we are supposed to gather that "the Ergonomic Society recommended that chiropractic treatment be directed toward those adults who suffer from severe back problems" means that the Ergonomic Society is recommending that such treatment not be directed at people who do not have back problems, but that that is the case is not entirely clear.

Meanwhile, your negation seems to contain an error.
joealam1 wrote:NEGATION of C: Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back are more likely to develop back pain than those who do not.
Did you mean to say "are less likely"?

Since C says

"Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back problems are not less likely to develop back pain ..."

the logical negation of C is

Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back problems are less likely to develop back pain ...

As you indicated, if C negated is true, then the argument is unsound, for C negated indicates that by directing chiropractic treatment at people who are not experiencing severe back problems, one could reduce the proportion of the population that will suffer from back pain.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion