BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

manhattan challenge problem_DS_is n < 1

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by cramya » Sat May 02, 2009 6:59 am
I am getting E

Stmt I

nx-n<0

n(x-1)<0

n->positive greater than 1 and x-1<0 then NO n is not less than 1

n-> negative and x-1>0 then YES n<1

INSUFF

Stmt II

x-1 = -2

No idea what n could be

TOGETHER:

n (x-1) < 0

x-1 = -2

-2n < 0

All we can say is n>0
n = 10000000 NO
n=1/2 YES


Must be missing a trick if its C

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by dumb.doofus » Sat May 02, 2009 7:05 am
Just my opinion..

I think the above problem makes more sense if

a) = nx - x instead of nx - n

if it is nx - x then the answer is definitely C..

Can you confirm the above please?
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion

by abhinav85 » Sat May 02, 2009 7:21 am
IMO E for me too.

To find out if n<1 we have to find out the value of n?

From A we cannot say that n is positive or negative..becoz we
don't know the value of x.(insufficient)

From B we get the value of x that is -1.(insufficient)

Now when we take them together and put the value of
x in nx-n< 0
= -n-n < 0
=-2n<0

now if we take n as negative that is say -1 we get n> 0.

and if we take n as postive say 1 we get n < 0.
Join the discussion

by nh8404052006 » Sat May 02, 2009 7:26 am
From statement (2) ==>x = &#8211; 1 , but no info abt n ==> insufficient
From statement (1) ==> n (x &#8211; 1 ) < 0 . If n = &#8211; 1 and x =2 , n (x &#8211; 1 ) < 0 but when n = 2 and x = 0 , then n (x &#8211; 1 ) < 0 ==> insufficient
Both statements together ==>if x = &#8211; 1, and n (x &#8211; 1 ) < 0 ==> n > 0 ==>sufficient
Why? when the red portion is negative, the blue portion MUST be positive; otherwise, the inequaility( <0 )does not hold
Join the discussion