BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan CAT Q...problem with subjunctive mood

Expert replies
by bsandhyav » Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:07 pm
The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction against the hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client.
A they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client
B the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of an economic nature
C they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client
D the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages further
E immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages


Guyz i think E is wrong 'coz if it had to be right...it should have been worded as
'immediate action be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages'.
According to me this follows the rule of subjuctive 'that + infinitive form of verb (without to)' But i'm wrong...plz can some explain to me why i am wrong? Does the 'ing' form used here (arguing) alter the rule in any way?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by EricLien9122 » Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:26 am
I think the big problem with this sentence is "they" refers to lawyers while should refers to judge.

we can rule out A and C.
D: "them refers to lawyers while should refer to patent holder.

B: act (purual) should be acts (singular).

as for E, I don't see a subjunctive mood. It's only subjunctive if the sentence actually has a command type verbs, such as require, mandate....etc (MGMAT book list a few).

The sentence is written in passive voice, and it's okay based on the structure of the sentence.


I hope this makes sense, please correct me if I made a mistake.
Join the discussion

by bsandhyav » Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:20 am
Yeah...i guess you are right. 'argue' would not require a subjunctive mood.

But i feel that sentence B is wrong more 'coz it is wordy and awkward because of the usage of 'damages of an economic nature' rather than sub-verb agreement. Though what u mentioned is perfectly right in terms of gramatical rules singular judge requires singular verb acts. But somehow when i read the sentence with acts it sounds wrong to me. I feel 'coz of the structure of the sentence 'arguing that they should...' the infinitive form 'to act' is more appropriate. What do u think?
Join the discussion

by singalong » Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:24 am
any expert can help me out here?

I was confused between B and E. Chose B. I can say I am wrong about B coz it adds 'client' in the word instead of patent holder.But if you overlook this, I chose B coz it's active.

E uses passive voice though it's not wordy. So in situations like this which option would carry more weight-age.The one which is less wordy or the one which uses passive voice. I say this coz it's widely believed options voice are to be avoided as much as possible.
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 9:46 am
Yup somehow I also feel that in option B act is right instead of acts bec of the usage of should........someone plz clear on the same.....
Join the discussion

by mankey » Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:40 am
My take B. Please provide OA.

Thanks
Mankey
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:11 pm
E is my choice and to the original poster.

arguing that.... is not a command so "should be taken" works

B is awkward with the construction of "damages of an economic nature"
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:17 am
+1 for E.. B seems to have more than one mistake.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by Mayur Sand » Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:27 am
My 2 cents are on E as well . B adds word "client" , which makes it wordy
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:29 am
On second attempt, I choose E. What is the OA for this one?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1